Ethical and Legal Guidance for Mental Health Practitioners Who Wish to Conduct Research in a Private Practice Setting

Mental health practitioners, even when they have research training, rarely contribute to the scientific literature. One reason for this may be that they need help addressing the ethical and legal issues they encounter as they contemplate undertaking research in a clinical practice setting. To addres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavior therapy 2021-03, Vol.52 (2), p.313-323
Main Authors: Persons, Jacqueline B., Osborne, Travis L., Codd, R. Trent
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
ethics
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
HIPAA
Humans
informed consent
Mental Health
practice-based research
Private Practice
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Mental health practitioners, even when they have research training, rarely contribute to the scientific literature. One reason for this may be that they need help addressing the ethical and legal issues they encounter as they contemplate undertaking research in a clinical practice setting. To address that need, we offer several types of guidance for conducting research in a private practice setting in a way that meets high ethical and legal standards. We describe the situations in which ethical review of a research proposal by a federally registered institutional review board (IRB) is legally required, and identify alternate mechanisms that practitioners can use to obtain an ethical review when a formal IRB review is not required by law. We discuss legal and ethical requirements of conducting single-case studies in a practice setting. We provide a rationale, and free and inexpensive options, for obtaining a formal certificate of training in human subjects research. And we offer guidance for obtaining informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization from research participants. We conclude with a brief discussion of other legal and professional issues to consider when conducting research in private practice. •Practitioners rarely contribute to the scientific literature.•Review by a federally registered IRB is not required in many circumstances.•Informed consent is a hallmark of ethically conducted research.•HIPAA-covered entities must obtain HIPAA research authorization from participants.
ISSN:0005-7894
1878-1888
DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.012