Loading…

Prevalence of urinary incontinence among women with diabetes in the Lolland‐Falster Health Study, Denmark

Aims To investigate the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and UI subtypes (stress, urgency, and mixed UI) in women with or without diabetes mellitus; and to investigate the association between diabetes and UI (any and subtypes). Methods A cross‐sectional study based on the Lolland‐Falster, Den...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2021-03, Vol.40 (3), p.855-867
Main Authors: Løwenstein, Ea, Jepsen, Randi, Andersen, Lea L., Laigaard, Jennie, Møller, Lars A., Gæde, Peter, Bonde, Lisbeth, Gimbel, Helga
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims To investigate the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and UI subtypes (stress, urgency, and mixed UI) in women with or without diabetes mellitus; and to investigate the association between diabetes and UI (any and subtypes). Methods A cross‐sectional study based on the Lolland‐Falster, Denmark population‐based health study. From 2016 to 2020, clinical measurement, questionnaires, and blood tests were collected. A total of 8563 women aged 18 or older were enrolled. Data analysis included 7906 women. UI was defined as any involuntary leakage of urine during the previous 4 weeks. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders: age, body mass index, parity, physical activity, previous gestational diabetes, education, and smoking. Results UI prevalence was 50.3% in women with diabetes and 39.3% in women without diabetes. The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for UI in women with diabetes was OR 1.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–1.92) and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.88–1.38), respectively. Mixed UI was associated with diabetes after controlling for confounders. A subgroup analysis found women using multiple antidiabetic medications had increased odds of UI, 2.75 (95% CI, 1.38–5.48), after controlling for confounders. Conclusion The prevalence of UI in women with diabetes was higher than in women without diabetes. The odds of UI was 56% higher in women with diabetes compared with women without diabetes but the effect was attenuated when controlling for confounders and statistically significance was not achieved. For a subgroup using multiple antidiabetic medications, the risk of UI was higher than in women without diabetes.
ISSN:0733-2467
1520-6777
DOI:10.1002/nau.24636