Partitioning of Aβ Peptide Fragments into Blood–Brain Barrier Mimetic Bilayer

• Published in: The journal of physical chemistry. B 2021-03, Vol.125 (10), p.2658-2676
• Main Authors: Siwy, Christopher M, Delfing, Bryan M, Lockhart, Christopher, Smith, Amy K, Klimov, Dmitri K
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amyloid beta-Peptides - metabolism; B: Biomaterials and Membranes; Blood-Brain Barrier - metabolism; Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine; Lipid Bilayers; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Peptide Fragments
• ISSN: 1520-6106; 1520-5207
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c11253

We used all-atom replica-exchange umbrella sampling molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the partitioning of the charged tetrapeptide KLVF and its neutral apolar counterpart VVIA into the blood–brain barrier (BBB)–mimetic bilayer. Our findings allowed us to reconstruct the partitioning mechanism for these two Aβ peptide fragments. Despite dissimilar sequences, their permeation shares significant common features. Computations of free energies and permeabilities show that partitioning of both peptides is highly unfavorable, ruling out passive transport. The peptides experience multiple rotational transitions within the bilayer and typically cause considerable lipid disorder and bilayer thinning. Near the bilayer midplane, they lose almost entirely their solvation shell and the interactions with the lipid headgroups. The peptides cause complex reorganization within the proximal bilayer region. Upon insertion, they induce striking cholesterol influx reversed by its depletion and the influx of DMPC when the peptides reach the midplane. The differences in partitioning mechanisms are due to the much higher polarity of KLVF peptide, the permeation of which is more unfavorable and which exclusively assumes vertical orientations within the bilayer. In contrast, VVIA positions itself flat between the leaflets, causing minor disorder and even thickening of the BBB–mimetic bilayer. Due to the high density of the cholesterol-rich BBB bilayer, the unfavorable work associated with the peptide insertion provides a significant, but not dominant, contribution to the partition free energy, which is still governed by dehydration and loss of peptide–headgroup interactions. Comparison with experiments indicates that KLVF and VVIA permeation is similar to that of proline tetrapeptide, mannitol, or cimetidine, all of which exhibit no passive transport.