Surgical and non-surgical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis: a two-center 12-month randomized trial

• Published in: Clinical oral investigations 2021-10, Vol.25 (10), p.5723-5733
• Main Authors: Wagner, Tassiane Panta, Pires, Paula Rodrigues, Rios, Fernando Silva, de Oliveira, Joao Augusto Peixoto, Costa, Ricardo dos Santos Araujo, Cunha, Kelly F., Silveira, Heraldo Luis Dias, Pimentel, Suzana, Casati, Marcio Zaffalon, Rosing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker, Haas, Alex Nogueira
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bone implants; Bone loss; Debridement; Dentistry; Medicine; Original Article; Radiography; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 1432-6981; 1436-3771
• DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03874-z

Objectives To compare surgical (ST) and non-surgical (NST) debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis in a two-center randomized trial. Materials and methods Forty-five individuals with 63 implants with probing depth (PPD) ≥5mm, bleeding on probing (BOP), and radiographic bone loss ≥2mm were included. In the NST (30 implants), submucosal debridement was performed. In the ST (33 implants), a mucoperiosteal flap was raised and surfaces were decontaminated only by debridement as performed in NST. Clinical parameters and radiographs were compared at baseline and after 12 months. Means and standard errors were reported. Results PPD considering all implant sites reduced significantly in NST from 4.14±0.25 to 3.25±0.18mm. In ST, PPD also significantly changed (3.74±0.22 to 3.00±0.29mm). No significant differences were observed between the two groups. For deep sites (≥7mm), PPD was 7.82±0.20mm at baseline and reduced to 5.10±0.30mm in NST, while in ST group, it was 7.11±0.11mm and changed to 5.22±0.91mm (between-groups p value=0.51). BOP significantly reduced from ~60 to 35% of all sites in both groups, without significant differences between them. When sites with radiographic bone level ≥3mm at baseline were analyzed, there was a significant difference between groups in bone gain after 12 months in favor of ST (ST=0.78±0.30mm compared to NST=0.25mm±0.13; p =0.03). Conclusions Surgical and non-surgical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis present similar clinical outcomes. Bone levels were better improved in ST than NST for sites with higher initial bone loss. Clinical relevance The treatment of peri-implantitis is still a challenge in clinical practice, since less than half of affected implants achieve health after surgical or non-surgical debridement. Considering the lack of clinically relevant differences between these two treatments, non-surgical debridement should be considered the first therapeutic choice for peri-implantitis, mainly mild to moderate cases.