Loading…
Infection with Dirofilaria immitis and Other Infections in Cats and Dogs from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The Need for Prophylactic Enforcement
Purpose Dirofilaria immitis , a mosquito-borne nematode that primarily infects dogs, can equally infect cats. Although there have been numerous studies on canine heartworm prevalence in Brazil, there have been few studies on feline infections. Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta parasitologica 2021-09, Vol.66 (3), p.962-968 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
Dirofilaria immitis
, a mosquito-borne nematode that primarily infects dogs, can equally infect cats. Although there have been numerous studies on canine heartworm prevalence in Brazil, there have been few studies on feline infections. Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) are both life-threatening retroviruses transmitted directly between cats. Infections with
Ehrlichia
spp. and
Anaplasma
spp. are highly prevalent among dogs in Brazil, with
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
being the main vector for both bacteria. This study aimed to gather information on these infections among dogs and cats in the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro by performing rapid point-of-care tests for prophylactic enforcement.
Methods
Surplus samples of serum or plasma from private laboratories were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (SNAP Feline Triple Test or SNAP 4Dx Plus Test).
Results
The prevalence of heartworm disease was 7% among dogs and 0.9% among cats, the latter being 12.9% of the former. The prevalence of FIV and FeLV was 4.3 and 11.9%, respectively. Among dogs, the seroprevalence of
Ehrlichia
spp. and
Anaplasma
spp. was 27.1 and 9.8%, respectively, and
Borrelia burgdorferi
was not detected.
Conclusion
Given that such infections circulate among pets, prophylactic measures should be encouraged by small animal practitioners. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1230-2821 1896-1851 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11686-021-00345-z |