Assessing in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for standardized reporting

• Published in: World journal of urology 2021-10, Vol.39 (10), p.3921-3930
• Main Authors: Bandini, Marco, Barbagli, Guido, Leni, Riccardo, Cirulli, Giuseppe O., Basile, Giuseppe, Balò, Sofia, Montorsi, Francesco, Sansalone, Salvatore, Salonia, Andrea, Briganti, Alberto, Butnaru, Denis, Lazzeri, Massimo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Anastomosis; Complications; Europe; Humans; Kalanchoe; Logistic Models; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Nephrology; Oncology; Original Article; Patients; Penis; Perineum - surgery; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology; Proportional Hazards Models; Quality of Health Care; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology; Urethral Stricture - surgery; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods; Urology
• ISSN: 0724-4983; 1433-8726
• DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03692-8

Purpose To conduct a rigorous assessment of in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty according with the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for complication reporting. Methods We retrospectively (2015–2019) identified 469 consecutive patients receiving urethroplasty (e.g. bulbar urethroplasty with grafts, penile urethroplasty with/without grafts/flaps, Johanson, de novo or revision perineostomy, end-to-end anastomosis, meatoplasty and/or meatotomy) at our tertiary care institution. Complications were graded with Clavien–Dindo score and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Complications were classified in: bleeding no gastrointestinal, cardiac, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, infectious, neurological, oral, wound, miscellaneous, and pulmonary. Logistic regression tested for predictors of in-hospital complications and prolonged hospitalization (> 75th percentile). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression investigated the effect of complications on failure after urethroplasty. Results Overall, 161 (34.3%) patients experienced at least one complication. Of those, 47 (10%) experienced two or more complications and 59 (12.6%) experienced at least one Clavien–Dindo ≥ II complication. Only two patients had Clavien–Dindo III complications. Infectious was the most frequent complication, and de novo or revision perineostomy was associated with the highest rate of complications. The occurrence of any complications, as well as complication with Clavien–Dindo ≥ II were associated with prolonged hospitalizations, but not with higher rates of post-urethroplasty failure. Conclusions Complications after urethroplasty were common events, but rarely with severe sequelae. Infectious were the most common complications and perineostomy was the type of urethroplasty with the highest rate of complications. The application of the EAU recommendations allowed the identifications of a higher number of complications after urethroplasty if compared with previous reports based on unsupervised chart review.