Loading…

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study

Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome, associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, and is influenced by the gut microbiota. We investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on cachexia and treatment response in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. In a doub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical cancer research 2021-07, Vol.27 (13), p.3784-3792
Main Authors: de Clercq, Nicolien C, van den Ende, Tom, Prodan, Andrei, Hemke, Robert, Davids, Mark, Pedersen, Helle K, Nielsen, Henrik B, Groen, A K, de Vos, Willem M, van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M, Nieuwdorp, Max
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c88238a236931f27539803e58934f9c7a7ce450f3cb0cae0e607de59356f6fe23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c88238a236931f27539803e58934f9c7a7ce450f3cb0cae0e607de59356f6fe23
container_end_page 3792
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3784
container_title Clinical cancer research
container_volume 27
creator de Clercq, Nicolien C
van den Ende, Tom
Prodan, Andrei
Hemke, Robert
Davids, Mark
Pedersen, Helle K
Nielsen, Henrik B
Groen, A K
de Vos, Willem M
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M
Nieuwdorp, Max
description Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome, associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, and is influenced by the gut microbiota. We investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on cachexia and treatment response in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial performed in the Amsterdam University Medical Center, we assigned 24 cachectic patients with metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal cancer to either allogenic FMT (healthy obese donor) or autologous FMT, prior to palliative chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Primary objective was to assess the effect of allogenic FMT on satiety. Secondary outcomes were other features of cachexia, along with disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Finally, exploratory analyses were performed on the effect of FMT on gut microbiota composition (metagenomic sequencing) and metabolites (untargeted metabolomics). Allogenic FMT did not improve any of the cachexia outcomes. Patients in the allogenic group ( = 12) had a higher DCR at 12 weeks ( = 0.035) compared with the autologous group ( = 12), longer median OS of 365 versus 227 days [HR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-1.05; = 0.057] and PFS of 204 versus 93 days (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.21-1.20; = 0.092). Patients in the allogenic group showed a significant shift in fecal microbiota composition after FMT ( = 0.010) indicating proper engraftment of the donor microbiota. FMT from a healthy obese donor prior to first-line chemotherapy did not affect cachexia, but may have improved response and survival in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. These results provide a rational for larger FMT trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4918
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2516843516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516843516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c88238a236931f27539803e58934f9c7a7ce450f3cb0cae0e607de59356f6fe23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCCAfOeBix3bicFultKxUtKtSzpbjTBqjxF5sp1V5tj5cHbXlMp6x_n9-ab6i-EjJKaVCfqWklphwVp627RUuCeYNla-KYypEjVlZide5f9EcFe9i_EMI5ZTwt8URY1IyWvPj4uEcjJ7QT2uC76xPGl0H7eJh0i7pZL1DQ_Az2t1CuAN7MybkA9p1EAGdeedDRNahVpsRTLIG7bMHXIrozqYRbfpb7Qz06ELHFDxEfxj1DeS8dv0P39AGXWnX-9n-g_5L3rh0E-Busi5P-0kb6DxuvcvmaVoV-1Hn5O0W_UpLf_--eDPoKcKH5_ek-H3-_br9gS93F9t2c4kNJzJhI2XJpC5Z1TA6lLVgjSQMhGwYHxpT69oAF2RgpiNGA4GK1D2IholqqAYo2Unx-WnvIfi_C8SkZhsNTPlI4JeoSkEryVmuWSqepPmeMQYY1CHYWYd7RYlawakVilqhqAxOlUSt4LLv03PE0s3Q_3e9kGKPxLGWTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516843516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals</source><creator>de Clercq, Nicolien C ; van den Ende, Tom ; Prodan, Andrei ; Hemke, Robert ; Davids, Mark ; Pedersen, Helle K ; Nielsen, Henrik B ; Groen, A K ; de Vos, Willem M ; van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M ; Nieuwdorp, Max</creator><creatorcontrib>de Clercq, Nicolien C ; van den Ende, Tom ; Prodan, Andrei ; Hemke, Robert ; Davids, Mark ; Pedersen, Helle K ; Nielsen, Henrik B ; Groen, A K ; de Vos, Willem M ; van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M ; Nieuwdorp, Max</creatorcontrib><description>Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome, associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, and is influenced by the gut microbiota. We investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on cachexia and treatment response in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial performed in the Amsterdam University Medical Center, we assigned 24 cachectic patients with metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal cancer to either allogenic FMT (healthy obese donor) or autologous FMT, prior to palliative chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Primary objective was to assess the effect of allogenic FMT on satiety. Secondary outcomes were other features of cachexia, along with disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Finally, exploratory analyses were performed on the effect of FMT on gut microbiota composition (metagenomic sequencing) and metabolites (untargeted metabolomics). Allogenic FMT did not improve any of the cachexia outcomes. Patients in the allogenic group ( = 12) had a higher DCR at 12 weeks ( = 0.035) compared with the autologous group ( = 12), longer median OS of 365 versus 227 days [HR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-1.05; = 0.057] and PFS of 204 versus 93 days (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.21-1.20; = 0.092). Patients in the allogenic group showed a significant shift in fecal microbiota composition after FMT ( = 0.010) indicating proper engraftment of the donor microbiota. FMT from a healthy obese donor prior to first-line chemotherapy did not affect cachexia, but may have improved response and survival in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. These results provide a rational for larger FMT trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4918</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33883174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cachexia - etiology ; Cachexia - microbiology ; Cachexia - therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Esophageal Neoplasms - complications ; Esophageal Neoplasms - microbiology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Obesity - microbiology ; Overweight - microbiology ; Stomach Neoplasms - complications ; Stomach Neoplasms - microbiology ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Clinical cancer research, 2021-07, Vol.27 (13), p.3784-3792</ispartof><rights>2021 American Association for Cancer Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c88238a236931f27539803e58934f9c7a7ce450f3cb0cae0e607de59356f6fe23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c88238a236931f27539803e58934f9c7a7ce450f3cb0cae0e607de59356f6fe23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2281-5713 ; 0000-0003-3081-9124 ; 0000-0001-9609-7377 ; 0000-0003-2830-2310</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Clercq, Nicolien C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Ende, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prodan, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemke, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davids, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Helle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Henrik B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groen, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vos, Willem M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwdorp, Max</creatorcontrib><title>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study</title><title>Clinical cancer research</title><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><description>Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome, associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, and is influenced by the gut microbiota. We investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on cachexia and treatment response in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial performed in the Amsterdam University Medical Center, we assigned 24 cachectic patients with metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal cancer to either allogenic FMT (healthy obese donor) or autologous FMT, prior to palliative chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Primary objective was to assess the effect of allogenic FMT on satiety. Secondary outcomes were other features of cachexia, along with disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Finally, exploratory analyses were performed on the effect of FMT on gut microbiota composition (metagenomic sequencing) and metabolites (untargeted metabolomics). Allogenic FMT did not improve any of the cachexia outcomes. Patients in the allogenic group ( = 12) had a higher DCR at 12 weeks ( = 0.035) compared with the autologous group ( = 12), longer median OS of 365 versus 227 days [HR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-1.05; = 0.057] and PFS of 204 versus 93 days (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.21-1.20; = 0.092). Patients in the allogenic group showed a significant shift in fecal microbiota composition after FMT ( = 0.010) indicating proper engraftment of the donor microbiota. FMT from a healthy obese donor prior to first-line chemotherapy did not affect cachexia, but may have improved response and survival in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. These results provide a rational for larger FMT trials.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cachexia - etiology</subject><subject>Cachexia - microbiology</subject><subject>Cachexia - therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - microbiology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Obesity - microbiology</subject><subject>Overweight - microbiology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - microbiology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwCCAfOeBix3bicFultKxUtKtSzpbjTBqjxF5sp1V5tj5cHbXlMp6x_n9-ab6i-EjJKaVCfqWklphwVp627RUuCeYNla-KYypEjVlZide5f9EcFe9i_EMI5ZTwt8URY1IyWvPj4uEcjJ7QT2uC76xPGl0H7eJh0i7pZL1DQ_Az2t1CuAN7MybkA9p1EAGdeedDRNahVpsRTLIG7bMHXIrozqYRbfpb7Qz06ELHFDxEfxj1DeS8dv0P39AGXWnX-9n-g_5L3rh0E-Busi5P-0kb6DxuvcvmaVoV-1Hn5O0W_UpLf_--eDPoKcKH5_ek-H3-_br9gS93F9t2c4kNJzJhI2XJpC5Z1TA6lLVgjSQMhGwYHxpT69oAF2RgpiNGA4GK1D2IholqqAYo2Unx-WnvIfi_C8SkZhsNTPlI4JeoSkEryVmuWSqepPmeMQYY1CHYWYd7RYlawakVilqhqAxOlUSt4LLv03PE0s3Q_3e9kGKPxLGWTg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>de Clercq, Nicolien C</creator><creator>van den Ende, Tom</creator><creator>Prodan, Andrei</creator><creator>Hemke, Robert</creator><creator>Davids, Mark</creator><creator>Pedersen, Helle K</creator><creator>Nielsen, Henrik B</creator><creator>Groen, A K</creator><creator>de Vos, Willem M</creator><creator>van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M</creator><creator>Nieuwdorp, Max</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-5713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-9124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9609-7377</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2830-2310</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study</title><author>de Clercq, Nicolien C ; van den Ende, Tom ; Prodan, Andrei ; Hemke, Robert ; Davids, Mark ; Pedersen, Helle K ; Nielsen, Henrik B ; Groen, A K ; de Vos, Willem M ; van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M ; Nieuwdorp, Max</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c88238a236931f27539803e58934f9c7a7ce450f3cb0cae0e607de59356f6fe23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cachexia - etiology</topic><topic>Cachexia - microbiology</topic><topic>Cachexia - therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - microbiology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Obesity - microbiology</topic><topic>Overweight - microbiology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - microbiology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Clercq, Nicolien C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Ende, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prodan, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemke, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davids, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, Helle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Henrik B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groen, A K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vos, Willem M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwdorp, Max</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Clercq, Nicolien C</au><au>van den Ende, Tom</au><au>Prodan, Andrei</au><au>Hemke, Robert</au><au>Davids, Mark</au><au>Pedersen, Helle K</au><au>Nielsen, Henrik B</au><au>Groen, A K</au><au>de Vos, Willem M</au><au>van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M</au><au>Nieuwdorp, Max</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cancer Res</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3784</spage><epage>3792</epage><pages>3784-3792</pages><issn>1078-0432</issn><eissn>1557-3265</eissn><abstract>Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome, associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, and is influenced by the gut microbiota. We investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on cachexia and treatment response in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial performed in the Amsterdam University Medical Center, we assigned 24 cachectic patients with metastatic HER2-negative gastroesophageal cancer to either allogenic FMT (healthy obese donor) or autologous FMT, prior to palliative chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Primary objective was to assess the effect of allogenic FMT on satiety. Secondary outcomes were other features of cachexia, along with disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Finally, exploratory analyses were performed on the effect of FMT on gut microbiota composition (metagenomic sequencing) and metabolites (untargeted metabolomics). Allogenic FMT did not improve any of the cachexia outcomes. Patients in the allogenic group ( = 12) had a higher DCR at 12 weeks ( = 0.035) compared with the autologous group ( = 12), longer median OS of 365 versus 227 days [HR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-1.05; = 0.057] and PFS of 204 versus 93 days (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.21-1.20; = 0.092). Patients in the allogenic group showed a significant shift in fecal microbiota composition after FMT ( = 0.010) indicating proper engraftment of the donor microbiota. FMT from a healthy obese donor prior to first-line chemotherapy did not affect cachexia, but may have improved response and survival in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. These results provide a rational for larger FMT trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33883174</pmid><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4918</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-5713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3081-9124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9609-7377</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2830-2310</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0432
ispartof Clinical cancer research, 2021-07, Vol.27 (13), p.3784-3792
issn 1078-0432
1557-3265
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2516843516
source Freely Accessible Science Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Cachexia - etiology
Cachexia - microbiology
Cachexia - therapy
Double-Blind Method
Esophageal Neoplasms - complications
Esophageal Neoplasms - microbiology
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
Female
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Obesity - microbiology
Overweight - microbiology
Stomach Neoplasms - complications
Stomach Neoplasms - microbiology
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
title Fecal Microbiota Transplantation from Overweight or Obese Donors in Cachectic Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-10T05%3A26%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fecal%20Microbiota%20Transplantation%20from%20Overweight%20or%20Obese%20Donors%20in%20Cachectic%20Patients%20with%20Advanced%20Gastroesophageal%20Cancer:%20A%20Randomized,%20Double-blind,%20Placebo-Controlled,%20Phase%20II%20Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cancer%20research&rft.au=de%20Clercq,%20Nicolien%20C&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3784&rft.epage=3792&rft.pages=3784-3792&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2516843516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c88238a236931f27539803e58934f9c7a7ce450f3cb0cae0e607de59356f6fe23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516843516&rft_id=info:pmid/33883174&rfr_iscdi=true