Loading…
Genetic analyses of a secondary poroma and trichoblastoma in a HRAS‐mutated sebaceous nevus
A sebaceous nevus is a congenital skin hamartoma caused by postzygotic HRAS or KRAS mosaic mutations. With age, affected individuals may develop secondary tumors within a sebaceous nevus. RAS mutations are harbored from the onset of sebaceous nevus, and further mutations can be expected to be requir...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of dermatology 2021-08, Vol.48 (8), p.1268-1272 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A sebaceous nevus is a congenital skin hamartoma caused by postzygotic HRAS or KRAS mosaic mutations. With age, affected individuals may develop secondary tumors within a sebaceous nevus. RAS mutations are harbored from the onset of sebaceous nevus, and further mutations can be expected to be required in order to explain the initiation of secondary tumors. However, genetic analyses of the secondary tumors have not been conducted. Herein, we describe the rare coexistence of a poroma and a trichoblastoma arising in a sebaceous nevus. This is the first report of an investigation of multiple genes in a secondary tumor in an SN. First, HRAS c.37G>C, which is the common mutation in sebaceous nevus, was detected in all three lesions (sebaceous nevus, poroma, and trichoblastoma). Next, to elucidate the potential second‐hit mutations in the secondary poroma and trichoblastoma, we applied a panel sequencing for skin cancers that was newly developed in our institution. Our comparison of the mutational profile of 95 skin cancer‐related genes in each of the three lesions newly revealed TP53 p.R158P in the poroma and NOTCH2 p.G329S in the trichoblastoma. TP53 p.R158P has been determined as a pathogenic mutation in other tumors, and NOTCH2 p.G329S was a novel mutation. We identified two novel mutations that may have contributed to the pathogenesis of the secondary tumor’s development. The roles of the mutations remain unclear. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0385-2407 1346-8138 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1346-8138.15919 |