Loading…

Best practice in the implementation of telehealth-based supportive cancer care: Using research evidence and discipline-based guidance

•Literature as well as professional guidelines on telehealth were reviewed.•There is limited attention to health care provider issues in delivering telehealth.•Key recommendations for optimising supportive cancer care telehealth are made. To investigate what factors need consideration for telehealth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient education and counseling 2021-11, Vol.104 (11), p.2682-2699
Main Authors: Spelten, Evelien.R., Hardman, Ruth.N., Pike, Kerryn.E., Yuen, Eva.Y.N., Wilson, Carlene
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4eb2708252035623ad468677dc4d58be6494241d0becb5cc8881fec5741fa8c93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4eb2708252035623ad468677dc4d58be6494241d0becb5cc8881fec5741fa8c93
container_end_page 2699
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2682
container_title Patient education and counseling
container_volume 104
creator Spelten, Evelien.R.
Hardman, Ruth.N.
Pike, Kerryn.E.
Yuen, Eva.Y.N.
Wilson, Carlene
description •Literature as well as professional guidelines on telehealth were reviewed.•There is limited attention to health care provider issues in delivering telehealth.•Key recommendations for optimising supportive cancer care telehealth are made. To investigate what factors need consideration for telehealth services for cancer supportive care, given the rapid transition to telehealth as a result of COVID-19. A scoping review and a review of current guidance and guidelines provided by professional bodies, representing relevant discipline groups for cancer supportive care, were conducted. We identified 19 papers and 23 telehealth guidance documents. The results highlight how the characteristics of patient group and healthcare provider influence the acceptability and utility of the service and establish a minimum set of preconditions. The reviews primarily examined patient-focused difficulties or issues with acceptability and efficacy, with only a minority highlighting how provider issues might also be implicated. By contrast, the guidance and guidelines described a need to address skills gaps in providing and receiving support through telehealth. The capacity and willingness of services to adapt, in the context of COVID-19, is reassuring. It is important that the impact of the move to telehealth on service quality is assessed and systems put in place to ensure sustainability, acceptability, and adaptability. Key recommendations can be made to assist service telehealth optimisation, many of which apply irrespective of the specific service focus.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520883444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0738399121002445</els_id><sourcerecordid>2520883444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4eb2708252035623ad468677dc4d58be6494241d0becb5cc8881fec5741fa8c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOxCAYhYnR6Hh5ADeGpZtWKLSlulLjLZnEja4Jhb8Ok94EOokP4HtLM6NLV2fBd074P4TOKUkpocXVOh1BpxnJaEp4SkixhxZUlCzJKeP7aEFKJhJWVfQIHXu_JpEoOD1ER4xVWSFItUDfd-ADHp3SwWrAtsdhFaMbW-igDyrYocdDgwO0sALVhlVSKw8G-2kcBxfsBrBWvQYXw8E1fve2_8AOPCinVxg21kB8xqo32Fiv7djaHnYjH5M1c_kUHTSq9XC2yxP0_vjwdv-cLF-fXu5vl4lmOQsJhzoricjyjLC8yJgyvBBFWRrNTS5qKHjFM04NqUHXudZCCNqAzktOGyV0xU7Q5XZ3dMPnFC-XXfwStK3qYZi8nJeFYJzziNItqt3gvYNGjs52yn1JSuRsX65ltC9n-5JwGd3GzsVufqo7MH-NX90RuNkCEI_cWHAyCpn1GOtAB2kG-8_8D7KKlxI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2520883444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best practice in the implementation of telehealth-based supportive cancer care: Using research evidence and discipline-based guidance</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Spelten, Evelien.R. ; Hardman, Ruth.N. ; Pike, Kerryn.E. ; Yuen, Eva.Y.N. ; Wilson, Carlene</creator><creatorcontrib>Spelten, Evelien.R. ; Hardman, Ruth.N. ; Pike, Kerryn.E. ; Yuen, Eva.Y.N. ; Wilson, Carlene</creatorcontrib><description>•Literature as well as professional guidelines on telehealth were reviewed.•There is limited attention to health care provider issues in delivering telehealth.•Key recommendations for optimising supportive cancer care telehealth are made. To investigate what factors need consideration for telehealth services for cancer supportive care, given the rapid transition to telehealth as a result of COVID-19. A scoping review and a review of current guidance and guidelines provided by professional bodies, representing relevant discipline groups for cancer supportive care, were conducted. We identified 19 papers and 23 telehealth guidance documents. The results highlight how the characteristics of patient group and healthcare provider influence the acceptability and utility of the service and establish a minimum set of preconditions. The reviews primarily examined patient-focused difficulties or issues with acceptability and efficacy, with only a minority highlighting how provider issues might also be implicated. By contrast, the guidance and guidelines described a need to address skills gaps in providing and receiving support through telehealth. The capacity and willingness of services to adapt, in the context of COVID-19, is reassuring. It is important that the impact of the move to telehealth on service quality is assessed and systems put in place to ensure sustainability, acceptability, and adaptability. Key recommendations can be made to assist service telehealth optimisation, many of which apply irrespective of the specific service focus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-3991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33926809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Allied health ; Ehealth ; Nursing ; Patient centred care ; Quality of care ; Supportive cancer care ; Telehealth ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>Patient education and counseling, 2021-11, Vol.104 (11), p.2682-2699</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4eb2708252035623ad468677dc4d58be6494241d0becb5cc8881fec5741fa8c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4eb2708252035623ad468677dc4d58be6494241d0becb5cc8881fec5741fa8c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1883-4690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spelten, Evelien.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardman, Ruth.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Kerryn.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, Eva.Y.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Carlene</creatorcontrib><title>Best practice in the implementation of telehealth-based supportive cancer care: Using research evidence and discipline-based guidance</title><title>Patient education and counseling</title><addtitle>Patient Educ Couns</addtitle><description>•Literature as well as professional guidelines on telehealth were reviewed.•There is limited attention to health care provider issues in delivering telehealth.•Key recommendations for optimising supportive cancer care telehealth are made. To investigate what factors need consideration for telehealth services for cancer supportive care, given the rapid transition to telehealth as a result of COVID-19. A scoping review and a review of current guidance and guidelines provided by professional bodies, representing relevant discipline groups for cancer supportive care, were conducted. We identified 19 papers and 23 telehealth guidance documents. The results highlight how the characteristics of patient group and healthcare provider influence the acceptability and utility of the service and establish a minimum set of preconditions. The reviews primarily examined patient-focused difficulties or issues with acceptability and efficacy, with only a minority highlighting how provider issues might also be implicated. By contrast, the guidance and guidelines described a need to address skills gaps in providing and receiving support through telehealth. The capacity and willingness of services to adapt, in the context of COVID-19, is reassuring. It is important that the impact of the move to telehealth on service quality is assessed and systems put in place to ensure sustainability, acceptability, and adaptability. Key recommendations can be made to assist service telehealth optimisation, many of which apply irrespective of the specific service focus.</description><subject>Allied health</subject><subject>Ehealth</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient centred care</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Supportive cancer care</subject><subject>Telehealth</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>0738-3991</issn><issn>1873-5134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOxCAYhYnR6Hh5ADeGpZtWKLSlulLjLZnEja4Jhb8Ok94EOokP4HtLM6NLV2fBd074P4TOKUkpocXVOh1BpxnJaEp4SkixhxZUlCzJKeP7aEFKJhJWVfQIHXu_JpEoOD1ER4xVWSFItUDfd-ADHp3SwWrAtsdhFaMbW-igDyrYocdDgwO0sALVhlVSKw8G-2kcBxfsBrBWvQYXw8E1fve2_8AOPCinVxg21kB8xqo32Fiv7djaHnYjH5M1c_kUHTSq9XC2yxP0_vjwdv-cLF-fXu5vl4lmOQsJhzoricjyjLC8yJgyvBBFWRrNTS5qKHjFM04NqUHXudZCCNqAzktOGyV0xU7Q5XZ3dMPnFC-XXfwStK3qYZi8nJeFYJzziNItqt3gvYNGjs52yn1JSuRsX65ltC9n-5JwGd3GzsVufqo7MH-NX90RuNkCEI_cWHAyCpn1GOtAB2kG-8_8D7KKlxI</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Spelten, Evelien.R.</creator><creator>Hardman, Ruth.N.</creator><creator>Pike, Kerryn.E.</creator><creator>Yuen, Eva.Y.N.</creator><creator>Wilson, Carlene</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-4690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Best practice in the implementation of telehealth-based supportive cancer care: Using research evidence and discipline-based guidance</title><author>Spelten, Evelien.R. ; Hardman, Ruth.N. ; Pike, Kerryn.E. ; Yuen, Eva.Y.N. ; Wilson, Carlene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4eb2708252035623ad468677dc4d58be6494241d0becb5cc8881fec5741fa8c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Allied health</topic><topic>Ehealth</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient centred care</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Supportive cancer care</topic><topic>Telehealth</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spelten, Evelien.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardman, Ruth.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Kerryn.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, Eva.Y.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Carlene</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spelten, Evelien.R.</au><au>Hardman, Ruth.N.</au><au>Pike, Kerryn.E.</au><au>Yuen, Eva.Y.N.</au><au>Wilson, Carlene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best practice in the implementation of telehealth-based supportive cancer care: Using research evidence and discipline-based guidance</atitle><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle><addtitle>Patient Educ Couns</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2682</spage><epage>2699</epage><pages>2682-2699</pages><issn>0738-3991</issn><eissn>1873-5134</eissn><abstract>•Literature as well as professional guidelines on telehealth were reviewed.•There is limited attention to health care provider issues in delivering telehealth.•Key recommendations for optimising supportive cancer care telehealth are made. To investigate what factors need consideration for telehealth services for cancer supportive care, given the rapid transition to telehealth as a result of COVID-19. A scoping review and a review of current guidance and guidelines provided by professional bodies, representing relevant discipline groups for cancer supportive care, were conducted. We identified 19 papers and 23 telehealth guidance documents. The results highlight how the characteristics of patient group and healthcare provider influence the acceptability and utility of the service and establish a minimum set of preconditions. The reviews primarily examined patient-focused difficulties or issues with acceptability and efficacy, with only a minority highlighting how provider issues might also be implicated. By contrast, the guidance and guidelines described a need to address skills gaps in providing and receiving support through telehealth. The capacity and willingness of services to adapt, in the context of COVID-19, is reassuring. It is important that the impact of the move to telehealth on service quality is assessed and systems put in place to ensure sustainability, acceptability, and adaptability. Key recommendations can be made to assist service telehealth optimisation, many of which apply irrespective of the specific service focus.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33926809</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.006</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-4690</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-3991
ispartof Patient education and counseling, 2021-11, Vol.104 (11), p.2682-2699
issn 0738-3991
1873-5134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520883444
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Allied health
Ehealth
Nursing
Patient centred care
Quality of care
Supportive cancer care
Telehealth
Telemedicine
title Best practice in the implementation of telehealth-based supportive cancer care: Using research evidence and discipline-based guidance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20practice%20in%20the%20implementation%20of%20telehealth-based%20supportive%20cancer%20care:%20Using%20research%20evidence%20and%20discipline-based%20guidance&rft.jtitle=Patient%20education%20and%20counseling&rft.au=Spelten,%20Evelien.R.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2682&rft.epage=2699&rft.pages=2682-2699&rft.issn=0738-3991&rft.eissn=1873-5134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520883444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-4eb2708252035623ad468677dc4d58be6494241d0becb5cc8881fec5741fa8c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2520883444&rft_id=info:pmid/33926809&rfr_iscdi=true