Loading…
Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists
Objective To evaluate diagnostic performance of a radiomics model for classifying hepatic cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from portal-phase abdominopelvic CT images. Methods This retrospective study included 502 CRC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced C...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2021-11, Vol.31 (11), p.8786-8796 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b6b79935264f468b1d69c3b22d6d76ab308e19507391f9c245c6a7793be32ccd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b6b79935264f468b1d69c3b22d6d76ab308e19507391f9c245c6a7793be32ccd3 |
container_end_page | 8796 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 8786 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Bae, Heejin Lee, Hansang Kim, Sungwon Han, Kyunghwa Rhee, Hyungjin Kim, Dong-kyu Kwon, Hyuk Hong, Helen Lim, Joon Seok |
description | Objective
To evaluate diagnostic performance of a radiomics model for classifying hepatic cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from portal-phase abdominopelvic CT images.
Methods
This retrospective study included 502 CRC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced liver MRI between January 2005 and December 2010. Portal-phase CT images of training (
n
= 386) and validation (
n
= 116) cohorts were used to develop a radiomics model for differentiating three classes of liver lesions. Among multiple handcrafted features, the feature selection was performed using ReliefF method, and random forest classifiers were used to train the selected features. Diagnostic performance of the developed model was compared with that of four radiologists. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on lesion size.
Results
The radiomics model demonstrated significantly lower overall and hemangioma- and metastasis-specific polytomous discrimination index (PDI) (overall, 0.8037; hemangioma-specific, 0.6653; metastasis-specific, 0.8027) than the radiologists (overall, 0.9622–0.9680; hemangioma-specific, 0.9452–0.9630; metastasis-specific, 0.9511–0.9869). For subgroup analysis, the PDI of the radiomics model was different according to the lesion size (< 10 mm, 0.6486; ≥ 10 mm, 0.8264) while that of the radiologists was relatively maintained. For classifying metastasis from benign lesions, the radiomics model showed excellent diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 84.36% and an AUC of 0.9426.
Conclusion
Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model achieved substantial diagnostic performance when differentiating hepatic lesions from portal-phase CT images of CRC patients. This model was limited particularly to classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter lesions.
Key Points
• Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model could differentiate cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis with substantial diagnostic performance using portal-phase CT images of colorectal cancer patients.
• The radiomics model demonstrated limitations especially in classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter liver lesions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-021-07877-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524870238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2582892946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b6b79935264f468b1d69c3b22d6d76ab308e19507391f9c245c6a7793be32ccd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-OFCEQh4nRuLOrL-DBkHjxghZ_pmm8mYm6JpuYmPVMaJreZUM3I8Uc5mX2WaV3Vk08eIJQX30F_Ah5xeEdB9DvEUBKYCA4A91rzY5PyIYrKRiHXj0lGzCyZ9oYdUbOEe8AwHCln5MzKY0GCXpD7r-7MeY5eqRucemIEWmeqM9LLQ4rC8utW3wY6e6aTrlQnxxinKJ3NeZlRW_Dvu19q3qXaArYzpHGpTlSLsHXdupXR6ErGJaKH2isSFOcY33QYGPnvSttTM20rDdK-SZixRfk2eQShpeP6wX58fnT9e6SXX378nX38Yp5xU1lQze0Z8qt6NSkun7gY2e8HIQYu1F3bpDQB262oKXhk_FCbX3ntDZyCFJ4P8oL8vbk3Zf88xCw2jmiDym5JeQDWrEVqtcgZN_QN_-gd_lQ2t-tVC96I4zqGiVOlC8ZsYTJ7kucXTlaDnZNz57Ssy09-5CePbam14_qwzCH8U_L77gaIE8AttJyE8rf2f_R_gJj5qiM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582892946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Bae, Heejin ; Lee, Hansang ; Kim, Sungwon ; Han, Kyunghwa ; Rhee, Hyungjin ; Kim, Dong-kyu ; Kwon, Hyuk ; Hong, Helen ; Lim, Joon Seok</creator><creatorcontrib>Bae, Heejin ; Lee, Hansang ; Kim, Sungwon ; Han, Kyunghwa ; Rhee, Hyungjin ; Kim, Dong-kyu ; Kwon, Hyuk ; Hong, Helen ; Lim, Joon Seok</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate diagnostic performance of a radiomics model for classifying hepatic cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from portal-phase abdominopelvic CT images.
Methods
This retrospective study included 502 CRC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced liver MRI between January 2005 and December 2010. Portal-phase CT images of training (
n
= 386) and validation (
n
= 116) cohorts were used to develop a radiomics model for differentiating three classes of liver lesions. Among multiple handcrafted features, the feature selection was performed using ReliefF method, and random forest classifiers were used to train the selected features. Diagnostic performance of the developed model was compared with that of four radiologists. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on lesion size.
Results
The radiomics model demonstrated significantly lower overall and hemangioma- and metastasis-specific polytomous discrimination index (PDI) (overall, 0.8037; hemangioma-specific, 0.6653; metastasis-specific, 0.8027) than the radiologists (overall, 0.9622–0.9680; hemangioma-specific, 0.9452–0.9630; metastasis-specific, 0.9511–0.9869). For subgroup analysis, the PDI of the radiomics model was different according to the lesion size (< 10 mm, 0.6486; ≥ 10 mm, 0.8264) while that of the radiologists was relatively maintained. For classifying metastasis from benign lesions, the radiomics model showed excellent diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 84.36% and an AUC of 0.9426.
Conclusion
Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model achieved substantial diagnostic performance when differentiating hepatic lesions from portal-phase CT images of CRC patients. This model was limited particularly to classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter lesions.
Key Points
• Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model could differentiate cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis with substantial diagnostic performance using portal-phase CT images of colorectal cancer patients.
• The radiomics model demonstrated limitations especially in classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter liver lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07877-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33970307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Computed tomography ; Cysts ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diagnostic systems ; Hemangioma ; Image classification ; Image contrast ; Image enhancement ; Imaging ; Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Lesions ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Neuroradiology ; Performance evaluation ; Radiology ; Radiomics ; Subgroups ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2021-11, Vol.31 (11), p.8786-8796</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b6b79935264f468b1d69c3b22d6d76ab308e19507391f9c245c6a7793be32ccd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b6b79935264f468b1d69c3b22d6d76ab308e19507391f9c245c6a7793be32ccd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0334-5042</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970307$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bae, Heejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hansang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, Hyungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Joon Seok</creatorcontrib><title>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate diagnostic performance of a radiomics model for classifying hepatic cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from portal-phase abdominopelvic CT images.
Methods
This retrospective study included 502 CRC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced liver MRI between January 2005 and December 2010. Portal-phase CT images of training (
n
= 386) and validation (
n
= 116) cohorts were used to develop a radiomics model for differentiating three classes of liver lesions. Among multiple handcrafted features, the feature selection was performed using ReliefF method, and random forest classifiers were used to train the selected features. Diagnostic performance of the developed model was compared with that of four radiologists. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on lesion size.
Results
The radiomics model demonstrated significantly lower overall and hemangioma- and metastasis-specific polytomous discrimination index (PDI) (overall, 0.8037; hemangioma-specific, 0.6653; metastasis-specific, 0.8027) than the radiologists (overall, 0.9622–0.9680; hemangioma-specific, 0.9452–0.9630; metastasis-specific, 0.9511–0.9869). For subgroup analysis, the PDI of the radiomics model was different according to the lesion size (< 10 mm, 0.6486; ≥ 10 mm, 0.8264) while that of the radiologists was relatively maintained. For classifying metastasis from benign lesions, the radiomics model showed excellent diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 84.36% and an AUC of 0.9426.
Conclusion
Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model achieved substantial diagnostic performance when differentiating hepatic lesions from portal-phase CT images of CRC patients. This model was limited particularly to classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter lesions.
Key Points
• Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model could differentiate cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis with substantial diagnostic performance using portal-phase CT images of colorectal cancer patients.
• The radiomics model demonstrated limitations especially in classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter liver lesions.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Hemangioma</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc-OFCEQh4nRuLOrL-DBkHjxghZ_pmm8mYm6JpuYmPVMaJreZUM3I8Uc5mX2WaV3Vk08eIJQX30F_Ah5xeEdB9DvEUBKYCA4A91rzY5PyIYrKRiHXj0lGzCyZ9oYdUbOEe8AwHCln5MzKY0GCXpD7r-7MeY5eqRucemIEWmeqM9LLQ4rC8utW3wY6e6aTrlQnxxinKJ3NeZlRW_Dvu19q3qXaArYzpHGpTlSLsHXdupXR6ErGJaKH2isSFOcY33QYGPnvSttTM20rDdK-SZixRfk2eQShpeP6wX58fnT9e6SXX378nX38Yp5xU1lQze0Z8qt6NSkun7gY2e8HIQYu1F3bpDQB262oKXhk_FCbX3ntDZyCFJ4P8oL8vbk3Zf88xCw2jmiDym5JeQDWrEVqtcgZN_QN_-gd_lQ2t-tVC96I4zqGiVOlC8ZsYTJ7kucXTlaDnZNz57Ssy09-5CePbam14_qwzCH8U_L77gaIE8AttJyE8rf2f_R_gJj5qiM</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Bae, Heejin</creator><creator>Lee, Hansang</creator><creator>Kim, Sungwon</creator><creator>Han, Kyunghwa</creator><creator>Rhee, Hyungjin</creator><creator>Kim, Dong-kyu</creator><creator>Kwon, Hyuk</creator><creator>Hong, Helen</creator><creator>Lim, Joon Seok</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0334-5042</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists</title><author>Bae, Heejin ; Lee, Hansang ; Kim, Sungwon ; Han, Kyunghwa ; Rhee, Hyungjin ; Kim, Dong-kyu ; Kwon, Hyuk ; Hong, Helen ; Lim, Joon Seok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b6b79935264f468b1d69c3b22d6d76ab308e19507391f9c245c6a7793be32ccd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Hemangioma</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bae, Heejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hansang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, Hyungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-kyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Joon Seok</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bae, Heejin</au><au>Lee, Hansang</au><au>Kim, Sungwon</au><au>Han, Kyunghwa</au><au>Rhee, Hyungjin</au><au>Kim, Dong-kyu</au><au>Kwon, Hyuk</au><au>Hong, Helen</au><au>Lim, Joon Seok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>8786</spage><epage>8796</epage><pages>8786-8796</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objective
To evaluate diagnostic performance of a radiomics model for classifying hepatic cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from portal-phase abdominopelvic CT images.
Methods
This retrospective study included 502 CRC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced liver MRI between January 2005 and December 2010. Portal-phase CT images of training (
n
= 386) and validation (
n
= 116) cohorts were used to develop a radiomics model for differentiating three classes of liver lesions. Among multiple handcrafted features, the feature selection was performed using ReliefF method, and random forest classifiers were used to train the selected features. Diagnostic performance of the developed model was compared with that of four radiologists. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on lesion size.
Results
The radiomics model demonstrated significantly lower overall and hemangioma- and metastasis-specific polytomous discrimination index (PDI) (overall, 0.8037; hemangioma-specific, 0.6653; metastasis-specific, 0.8027) than the radiologists (overall, 0.9622–0.9680; hemangioma-specific, 0.9452–0.9630; metastasis-specific, 0.9511–0.9869). For subgroup analysis, the PDI of the radiomics model was different according to the lesion size (< 10 mm, 0.6486; ≥ 10 mm, 0.8264) while that of the radiologists was relatively maintained. For classifying metastasis from benign lesions, the radiomics model showed excellent diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 84.36% and an AUC of 0.9426.
Conclusion
Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model achieved substantial diagnostic performance when differentiating hepatic lesions from portal-phase CT images of CRC patients. This model was limited particularly to classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter lesions.
Key Points
• Albeit inferior to the radiologists, the radiomics model could differentiate cyst, hemangioma, and metastasis with substantial diagnostic performance using portal-phase CT images of colorectal cancer patients.
• The radiomics model demonstrated limitations especially in classifying hemangiomas and subcentimeter liver lesions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33970307</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-021-07877-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0334-5042</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2021-11, Vol.31 (11), p.8786-8796 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524870238 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Cancer Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Computed tomography Cysts Diagnostic Radiology Diagnostic systems Hemangioma Image classification Image contrast Image enhancement Imaging Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Lesions Liver Liver cancer Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastases Metastasis Neuroradiology Performance evaluation Radiology Radiomics Subgroups Ultrasound |
title | Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A22%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiomics%20analysis%20of%20contrast-enhanced%20CT%20for%20classification%20of%20hepatic%20focal%20lesions%20in%20colorectal%20cancer%20patients:%20its%20limitations%20compared%20to%20radiologists&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Bae,%20Heejin&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=8786&rft.epage=8796&rft.pages=8786-8796&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-021-07877-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2582892946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b6b79935264f468b1d69c3b22d6d76ab308e19507391f9c245c6a7793be32ccd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582892946&rft_id=info:pmid/33970307&rfr_iscdi=true |