Loading…
No evidence of the clinical utility of single-item breakpoint to inform on tobacco demand in persons with substance use disorders
Rationale Behavioral economics has shown that single-item demand indicators are promising for capturing crucial aspects of nicotine reinforcement. It is suggested that brief breakpoint measures perform comparably to full-length demand indices in characterizing nicotine dependence; however, there hav...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychopharmacology 2021-09, Vol.238 (9), p.2525-2533 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Rationale
Behavioral economics has shown that single-item demand indicators are promising for capturing crucial aspects of nicotine reinforcement. It is suggested that brief breakpoint measures perform comparably to full-length demand indices in characterizing nicotine dependence; however, there have been no thorough assessments of their validity in clinical settings.
Objectives
This study aimed to assess the validity and accuracy of a single-item breakpoint in informing on tobacco demand.
Methods
The sample consisted of 88 treatment-seeking smokers (% males = 70.5%) enrolled in substance use treatment. Participants provided data on smoking characteristics and completed the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, a single-item breakpoint measure and a 14-item cigarette purchase task (CPT). Hierarchical regressions were performed to compare the predictive capability of a single-item breakpoint and full-length tobacco demand indicators in determining nicotine addiction severity.
Results
The single-item breakpoint was significantly correlated with all indices stemmed from the CPT and both latent factors (all
r
values = .250–.368). Neither the brief breakpoint nor the full-length breakpoint significantly predicted nicotine dependence. After controlling for sex and smoking variables, factor 2 [
β
= .565,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-3158 1432-2072 1432-2072 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00213-021-05875-y |