Double-sheath vacuum suction versus vacuum-assisted sheath minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of large renal stones: single-center experience

• Published in: World journal of urology 2021-11, Vol.39 (11), p.4255-4260
• Main Authors: Wu, Zhong-Hua, Liu, Tong-Zu, Wang, Xing-Huan, Wang, Yong-Zhi, Zheng, Hang, Zhang, Yin-Gao
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Calculi; Equipment Design; Female; Fever; Humans; Kidney Calculi - pathology; Kidney Calculi - surgery; Kidneys; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Nephrolithiasis; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - instrumentation; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods; Nephrology; Oncology; Original Article; Perfusion; Retrospective Studies; Suction - instrumentation; Suctioning; Urological surgery; Urology; Vacuum
• ISSN: 0724-4983; 1433-8726
• DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03731-4

Purpose To compare double-sheath vacuum suction minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (DS-mini-PCNL) with vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (VS-mini-PCNL) and to better define the potential benefits of DS-mini-PCNL. Methods Between July 2019 and May 2020, 117 patients with large radiopaque renal stones underwent mini-PCNL. Of these, 63 underwent DS-mini-PCNL and 54 underwent VS-mini-PCNL. For VS-mini-PCNL, a F20 Y-shaped sheath was used and the oblique arm of the sheath was connected to the vacuum suction. For DS-mini-PCNL, the oblique arm of a F20 Y-shaped sheath (the outer sheath) and a F16 Y-shaped sheath (the inner sheath) was connected to the perfusion inflow and the vacuum suction, respectively. A 550-μm holmium–YAG laser was used for stone fragmentation. Results Compared with VS-mini-PCNL group, DS-mini-PCNL group had significantly shorter operative time (35.78 ± 7.77 min vs. 44.56 ± 13.19 min; P  = 0.000) and significantly lower fever rate (1.6% vs. 11.1%; P  = 0.048). It was not significantly different between the two groups despite the higher initial stone-free rate seen for DS-mini-PCNL group relative to VS-mini-PCNL group (87.7% vs. 81.5%, P  = 0.346). Auxiliary procedure rates were 4.8% (three patients) in DS-mini-PCNL group and 16.7% (nine patients) in VS-mini-PCNL group, with a significant difference ( P  = 0.034). The difference in the final stone-free rate between the two groups was rendered insignificant (93.8% vs. 89.1%, P  = 0.510). Conclusions DS-mini-PCNL is a safe and effective modality for large renal stones, which could increase the efficiency of stone extraction and decrease infectious complications compared with VS-mini-PCNL.