Sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-grade endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of performance characteristics

• Published in: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2021-10, Vol.225 (4), p.367.e1-367.e39
• Main Authors: Marchocki, Zibi, Cusimano, Maria C., Clarfield, Lauren, Kim, Soyoun Rachel, Fazelzad, Rouhi, Espin-Garcia, Osvaldo, Bouchard-Fortier, Geneviève, Rossi, Emma C., Stewart, Katherine I., Soliman, Pamela T., How, Jeffrey A., Gotlieb, Walter H., Holloway, Robert W., Ianieri, Manuel M., Cabrera, Silvia, Lim, Yong Kuei, Ferguson, Sarah E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: endometrial cancer; high-grade; indocyanine green; sentinel lymph node
• ISSN: 0002-9378; 1097-6868
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.034

A sentinel lymph node biopsy is widely accepted as the standard of care for surgical staging in low-grade endometrial cancer, but its value in high-grade endometrial cancer remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the performance characteristics of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with endometrial cancer with high-grade histology (registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with identifying number CRD42020160280). We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase databases all through the OvidSP platform. The search was performed between January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing registered clinical trials. We included prospective cohort studies in which sentinel lymph node biopsy were evaluated in clinical stage I patients with high-grade endometrial cancer (grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, mixed, undifferentiated or dedifferentiated, and high-grade not otherwise specified) with a cervical injection of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node detection and at least a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as a reference standard. If the data were not reported specifically for patients with high-grade histology, the authors were contacted for aggregate data. We pooled the detection rates and measures of diagnostic accuracy using a generalized linear mixed-effects model with a logit and assessed the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. We identified 16 eligible studies of which the authors for 9 of the studies provided data on 429 patients with high-grade endometrial cancer specifically. The study-level median age was 66 years (range, 44–82.5 years) and the study-level median body mass index was 28.6 kg/m2 (range, 19.4–43.7 kg/m2). The pooled detection rates were 91% per patient (95% confidence interval, 85%–95%; I2=59%) and 64% bilaterally (95% confidence interval, 53%–73%; I2=69%). The overall node positivity rate was 26% (95% confidence interval, 19%–34%; I2=44%). Of the 87 patients with positive node results, a sentinel lymph node biopsy correctly identified 80, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 92% per patient (95% confidence interval, 84%–96%; I2=0%), a false negative rate of 8% (95% confidence inte