Valuing stakeholder preferences for environmental benefits of stormwater ponds: Evidence from choice experiment

• Published in: Journal of environmental management 2021-09, Vol.293, p.112828-112828, Article 112828
• Main Authors: Ureta, Joan, Motallebi, Marzieh, Vassalos, Michael, Alhassan, Mustapha, Ureta, J. Carl
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Choice experiment; Ecosystem services; Green stormwater infrastructure; Mixed logit model; Stormwater ponds
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112828

With population growth driving urban expansion in many cities in the United States, there is a need for a sustainable way to manage stormwater. Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) is considered an innovative way to handle stormwater because of its potential to provide multiple ecosystem services (ES) beyond flooding reduction. However, there is limited research regarding the society's perceived value for GSI practices' co-benefits. This study utilized stated-preference data obtained from a choice experiment in an online survey of 1159 South Carolina (SC) residents to estimate a monetary value for the ES provided by wet detention ponds— the most widely adopted stormwater practice in coastal counties of SC. The benefits examined are flooding reduction, water quality, wildlife habitat, recreation, and scenic beauty. The data were analyzed using a Mixed logit formulation. Considering the differences across the state, the model was estimated separately for five counties. Findings indicate that residents are willing to pay $13.8 to $37.8 annually for a 50% improvement in pollutant removal efficiency of ponds in addition to their current stormwater fee. Also, they are willing to pay $12.5 to $42.9 per year for the nearest pond to have buffer vegetation and wildlife. They are also likely to pay $5 to $22.5 for ponds to contribute to their neighborhood's scenic beauty. Furthermore, the results indicate that respondents from three counties are willing to pay $5.4 to $13.2 for a 50% improvement in flooding reduction, while those from two counties are likely to pay $3.9 to $4.9 for ponds to have recreational benefits. The findings of the study could help stormwater managers in designing their stormwater management programs, especially for better evaluation of stormwater utility fees. •Residents are willing to pay a premium to improve the ecosystem services of stormwater ponds.•Residents valued more the water quality benefits of ponds than its flooding reduction feature.•Improving stormwater pond features could generate huge community benefits.