Can nitrifiers from the sidestream deammonification process be a remedy for the N-overload of the mainstream reactor?

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2021-10, Vol.790, p.148066-148066, Article 148066
• Main Authors: Muszyński-Huhajło, Mateusz, Zięba, Bartosz, Janiak, Kamil, Miodoński, Stanisław, Jurga, Anna, Szetela, Ryszard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bioaugmentation; Deammonification failure; Nitrogen removal; Partial nitritation; WWTP overload
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148066

The combination of sidestream deammonification and bioaugmentation of the mainstream reactor using ammonia oxidizers from partial nitritation (PN) was not achieved before. This novel solution not only enables the efficient sidestream nitrogen removal, but also improves mainstream resistance to stress situations such as biomass washout or nitrogen overload. This feature is important for wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) equipped with reject water deammonification as its implementation leads to lower nitrifier mass in the mainstream reactor and therefore diminish ability to cope with rapid increase in the loading rate (i.e. due to sidestream process failure). The proposed approach presents the use of the excess sludge from a modified PN process to boost the mainstream nitrification in unfavourable conditions. In a long-term laboratory experiment, the operation of an existing WWTP at low temperature was simulated in two reactors using real wastewater fluxes. One of them was augmented with the excess sludge from a PN reactor that treats reject water containing 20% of the WWTP N-load. The treatment efficiency in both reactors was tested under different nitrogen loading rates, as well as in the case of the of biomass loss. The bioaugmentation intensity was set according to the actual nitrogen load balance of the modelled WWTP, resulting in a daily seed volume only equal to 0.28% of the reactors' influent. Two incidents were simulated, where the nitrogen load increased by about 24.5% and 34%. In both cases, the nitrification efficiency in the non-augmented reactor dropped by about 45%, while the augmented reactor maintained efficient ammonium removal. The bioaugmentation effect was also noticeable during biomass washout — only in the non-augmented reactor nitrification was insufficient for over 60 days. These results undoubtedly show the possibility of combining two different approaches for sidestream nitrogen removal into one technology demonstrating the advantages of both component solutions. [Display omitted] •Sidestream deammonification is combined with mainstream nitrifier bioaugmentation.•Sidestream deammonification failure increases the WWTP's nitrogen load.•Higher N-load due to such failure may lead to deterioration of the effluent quality.•A novel process is proposed to reduce the effect of deammonification failure.•Bioaugmentation using partial nitritation sludge improved the treatment capacity.