Loading…
Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer – Authors' reply
Tiffany Foo and colleagues, Giovanni Brandi and colleagues, and Raja Pramanik and colleagues suggested other stratification factors such as progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy of at least 6 months, previous resection, pretreatment serum CA19.9, peritoneal carcinomatosis, primary...
Saved in:
Published in: | The lancet oncology 2021-07, Vol.22 (7), p.e288-e289 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Tiffany Foo and colleagues, Giovanni Brandi and colleagues, and Raja Pramanik and colleagues suggested other stratification factors such as progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy of at least 6 months, previous resection, pretreatment serum CA19.9, peritoneal carcinomatosis, primary tumour site, and molecular profiling results. Platinum sensitivity has never been defined for biliary tract cancer; rather than using an arbitrary cutoff of 6 months, we tailored our definition to this cancer—namely, progression more than 90 days after day 1 of the last cycle of first-line cisplatin and gemcitabine, derived from 9 months' progression-free survival with cisplatin–gemcitabine minus 6 months of chemotherapy.2 Use of tumour markers as stratification factors in advanced disease has the difficulty of selecting a priori a clinically meaningful cutoff for high versus low categories. [...]we advise against directly extrapolating the (modest) benefit identified from FOLFOX to other chemotherapy strategies, as suggested by Pramanik and colleagues; adequately designed and powered trials are necessary to test other regimens. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-2045 1474-5488 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00341-7 |