Loading…

Comparison of two new surface treatment processes, laser-induced shock waves and primary explosive: application to fatigue behaviour

Two surface treatment processes, the one by laser-induced shock waves, the other by primary explosive, have been used on a 316 L type stainless steel in order to improve fatigue behaviour. In spite of very different shock characteristics (18 GPa, 0.6 ns for the laser treatment and 1.5 GPa, 1 μs for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 1992-08, Vol.156 (2), p.175-182
Main Authors: Gerland, M., Hallouin, M., Presles, H.N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two surface treatment processes, the one by laser-induced shock waves, the other by primary explosive, have been used on a 316 L type stainless steel in order to improve fatigue behaviour. In spite of very different shock characteristics (18 GPa, 0.6 ns for the laser treatment and 1.5 GPa, 1 μs for the explosive treatment), the microstructures and the microhardness profiles are rather similar. The significant increase of microhardness in the first 50 μm in depth is associated with a high twin density. The fatigue behaviour of the two treated samples is characterized by very high cyclic stresses during the whole cycling and slightly shorter fatigue lives than in the untreated material. The surface of the treated samples exhibits more considerable secondary microcrack density than the untreated material because of the high twin density of the near surface treated layers.
ISSN:0921-5093
1873-4936
DOI:10.1016/0921-5093(92)90149-U