Loading…
Identifying high‐risk surgical patients: A study of older adults whose code status changed to Do‐Not‐Resuscitate
Background There is a paucity of data on older adults (age ≥65 years) undergoing surgery who had an inpatient do‐not‐resuscitate (DNR) order, and the association between timing of DNR order and outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 1976 older adults in the American College of Surgeo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2021-12, Vol.69 (12), p.3445-3456 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
There is a paucity of data on older adults (age ≥65 years) undergoing surgery who had an inpatient do‐not‐resuscitate (DNR) order, and the association between timing of DNR order and outcomes.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of 1976 older adults in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program geriatric‐specific database (2014–2018). Patients were stratified by institution of a DNR order during their surgical admission (“new‐DNR” vs. “no‐DNR”), and matched by age (±3 years), frailty score (range: 0–1), and procedure. The main outcome of interest was occurrence of death or hospice transition (DoH) ≤30 postoperative days; this was analyzed using bivariate and multivariable methods.
Results
One in 36 older adults had a new‐DNR order. After matching, there were 988 new‐DNR and 988 no‐DNR patients. Median age and frailty score were 82 years and 0.2, respectively. Most underwent orthopedic (47.6%), general (37.6%), and vascular procedures (8.4%). Overall DoH rate ≤30 days was 44.4% for new‐DNR versus 4.0% for no‐DNR patients (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgs.17391 |