Loading…

Semicarbazones, thiosemicarbazone, thiazole and oxazole analogues as monoamine oxidase inhibitors: Synthesis, characterization, biological evaluation, molecular docking, and kinetic studies

A series of semicarbazone, thiosemicarbazone, and pyrazole derivatives (3a-3m) were designed, synthesized, and assessed for monoamine oxidase inhibition using two isoforms. [Display omitted] •A series of hydrazine-carboxamide, hydrazine-carbothioamide, and pyrazole analogues were synthesized.•Examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioorganic chemistry 2021-10, Vol.115, p.105209-105209, Article 105209
Main Authors: Qazi, Syeda Uroos, Naz, Asia, Hameed, Abdul, Osra, Faisal Abdulrhman, Jalil, Saquib, Iqbal, Jamshed, Shah, Syed Adnan Ali, Mirza, Agha Zeeshan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A series of semicarbazone, thiosemicarbazone, and pyrazole derivatives (3a-3m) were designed, synthesized, and assessed for monoamine oxidase inhibition using two isoforms. [Display omitted] •A series of hydrazine-carboxamide, hydrazine-carbothioamide, and pyrazole analogues were synthesized.•Examined for monoamine oxidase inhibition using two isoforms, MAO-A and MAO-B.•Molecular dockingandin-silicoADMEevaluation. A series of semicarbazone, thiosemicarbazone, thiazole, and oxazole derivatives were designed, synthesized, and examined for monoamine oxidase inhibition using two isoforms, i.e., MAO-A and MAO-B. Among all the analogues, 3c and 3j possessed substantial activity against MAO-A with IC50 values of 5.619 ± 1.04 µM and 0.5781 ± 0.1674 µM, respectively. Whereas 3d and 3j were active against monoamine oxidase B with the IC50 values of 9.952 ± 1.831 µM and 3.5 ± 0.7 µM, respectively. Other derivatives active against MAO-B were 3c and 3g with the IC50 values of 17.67 ± 5.6 µM and 37.18 ± 2.485 µM. Moreover, molecular docking studies were achieved for the most potent compound (3j) contrary to human MAO-A and MAO-B. Kinetic studies were also performed for the most potent analogue to evaluate its mode of interaction with MAO-A and MAO-B.
ISSN:0045-2068
1090-2120
DOI:10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105209