Loading…

Family-clinician shared decision making in intensive care units: Cluster randomized trial in China

•The FCSDM intervention improved families’ satisfaction.•The FCSDM intervention decreased families’ depression.•The FCSDM intervention shortened patients’ length of stay in ICU.•The FCSDM intervention improved clinicians’ collaboration. To investigate if a Family-Clinician Shared Decision-Making (FC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient education and counseling 2022-06, Vol.105 (6), p.1532-1538
Main Authors: Liu, Xinchun, Humphris, Gerald, Luo, Aijing, Yang, Mingshi, Yan, Jin, Huang, Shaohua, Xiao, Siyu, Lv, Ailian, Wu, Guobao, Gui, Peigen, Wang, Qingyan, Zhang, Yudong, Yan, Yaxin, Jing, Nie, Xu, Jie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The FCSDM intervention improved families’ satisfaction.•The FCSDM intervention decreased families’ depression.•The FCSDM intervention shortened patients’ length of stay in ICU.•The FCSDM intervention improved clinicians’ collaboration. To investigate if a Family-Clinician Shared Decision-Making (FCSDM) intervention benefits patients, families and intensive care units (ICUs) clinicians. Six ICUs in China were allocated to intervention or usual care. 548 patients with critical illness, 548 family members and 387 ICU clinicians were included into the study. Structured FCSDM family meetings were held in the intervention group. Scales of SSDM, HADS, QoL2 and CSACD were used to assess families’ satisfaction and distress, patients’ quality of life, and clinicians’ collaboration respectively. Comparing the intervention group with the control group at post-intervention, there were significant differences in the families’ satisfaction (P = 0.0001), depression level (P = 0.005), and patients’ quality of life (P = 0.0007). The clinicians’ mean CSCAD score was more positive in the intervention group than controls (P 
ISSN:0738-3991
1873-5134
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.004