Loading…

Neither Surgical Margin Status nor Somatic Mutation Predicts Local Recurrence After R0-intent Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Background We evaluated the associations of surgical margin status and somatic mutations with the incidence of local recurrence (LR) and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing R0-intent (microscopically negative margin) resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods Patients with CLM who...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2022-04, Vol.26 (4), p.791-801
Main Authors: Nishioka, Yujiro, Paez-Arango, Natalia, Boettcher, Federico Oppliger, Kawaguchi, Yoshikuni, Newhook, Timothy E., Chun, Yun Shin, Tzeng, Ching-Wei D., Tran Cao, Hop S., Lee, Jeffrey E., Vreeland, Timothy J., Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background We evaluated the associations of surgical margin status and somatic mutations with the incidence of local recurrence (LR) and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing R0-intent (microscopically negative margin) resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods Patients with CLM who underwent initial R0-intent resection and analysis of tumor tissue using next-generation sequencing during 2001–2018 were analyzed. Recurrences were classified as LR (at the resection margin), other intrahepatic recurrence, or extrahepatic recurrence. Predictors and survival effect of LR were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Of 552 patients analyzed, 415 (75%) had R0 resection (margin width ≥ 1.0 mm), and 38 (7%) had LR. LR incidence was not affected by surgical margin width. RAS / TP53 co-mutation was associated with increased risk of intrahepatic recurrence (67% vs. 49%; p  
ISSN:1091-255X
1873-4626
DOI:10.1007/s11605-021-05173-0