Loading…
Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Background The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.212-218 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-b36967b6d1a242e99cc903cae0196032863db33a1e156e9ee3a5b4e7a3f84a923 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-b36967b6d1a242e99cc903cae0196032863db33a1e156e9ee3a5b4e7a3f84a923 |
container_end_page | 218 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 212 |
container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Cheng, Yuda Wang, Zhanqi Li, Yujun Qi, Jinlei Liu, Jinyu |
description | Background
The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect in CRT. This study aim to explore the efficacy and safety of LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, and CNKI databases for studies about LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB. QRS duration (QRSd), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pacing threshold and other related data were extracted and summarized.
Results
A total of 6 studies were included, and the success rate of LBBP was 93.2%. Compared with baseline, LBBP could shorten QRSd (MD = 61.23, 95% CI: 58.21–64.25, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pace.14405 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2597484138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2597484138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-b36967b6d1a242e99cc903cae0196032863db33a1e156e9ee3a5b4e7a3f84a923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctq3DAUBmBRGprJtJs-QBF0UwKeStbFVnfDkBsMpIt2bY7l445S2Z5KdobpKo_QZ8yTRMmkXbRQbQ6I7_wc-Al5y9mCp_dxCxYXXEqmXpAZV5JlJVfmJZkxLousFKU5Jicx3jDGNJPqFTkWstBaKDMjP9fYjrSe-sYjrQP0dkNTnuu_UdfTDUIYaQvOTwHT_-iwHyPduXFD_b-LtR_s9090SeM-jtglbmnAW4c7Cn1DOxzh_u4X9OD30cXX5KgFH_HN85yTr-dnX1aX2fr64mq1XGdWqEJltdBGF7VuOOQyR2OsNUxYQMaNZiIvtWhqIYAjVxoNogBVSyxAtKUEk4s5-XDI3Ybhx4RxrDoXLXoPPQ5TrHJlCllKLspE3_9Fb4YppHuT0nmRl1wwk9TpQdkwxBiwrbbBdRD2FWfVYyPVYyPVUyMJv3uOnOoOmz_0dwUJ8APYOY_7_0RVn5ers0PoA_BDlwU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627281309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Cheng, Yuda ; Wang, Zhanqi ; Li, Yujun ; Qi, Jinlei ; Liu, Jinyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuda ; Wang, Zhanqi ; Li, Yujun ; Qi, Jinlei ; Liu, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect in CRT. This study aim to explore the efficacy and safety of LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, and CNKI databases for studies about LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB. QRS duration (QRSd), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pacing threshold and other related data were extracted and summarized.
Results
A total of 6 studies were included, and the success rate of LBBP was 93.2%. Compared with baseline, LBBP could shorten QRSd (MD = 61.23, 95% CI: 58.21–64.25, p < .01). Echocardiographic parameters including LVEF and LVEDD significantly improved (both with p < .01). Clinical outcomes including NYHA classification and BNP dramatically reduced (both with p < .01). Compared with biventricular pacing (BVP), LBBP could further improve QRSd, LVEF, LVEDD, and NYHA classification (all with p < .01). However, the pacing threshold at follow‐up was 0.06 V higher than that at baseline (p < .01), and the incidence of complications was 2.4%.
Conclusions
LBBP is effective and safe in heart failure patients with LBBB, whether it is better than BVP needs to be verified by randomized controlled trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.14405</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34766359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>biventricular pacing ; Bundle-Branch Block - complications ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; cardiac resynchronization therapy ; Classification ; Clinical trials ; Congestive heart failure ; Heart failure ; Heart Failure - complications ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Humans ; left bundle branch block ; left bundle branch pacing ; Meta-analysis ; Patients ; Ventricle</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.212-218</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-b36967b6d1a242e99cc903cae0196032863db33a1e156e9ee3a5b4e7a3f84a923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-b36967b6d1a242e99cc903cae0196032863db33a1e156e9ee3a5b4e7a3f84a923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3251-9507 ; 0000-0003-4937-2123</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34766359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhanqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Jinlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><title>Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Background
The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect in CRT. This study aim to explore the efficacy and safety of LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, and CNKI databases for studies about LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB. QRS duration (QRSd), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pacing threshold and other related data were extracted and summarized.
Results
A total of 6 studies were included, and the success rate of LBBP was 93.2%. Compared with baseline, LBBP could shorten QRSd (MD = 61.23, 95% CI: 58.21–64.25, p < .01). Echocardiographic parameters including LVEF and LVEDD significantly improved (both with p < .01). Clinical outcomes including NYHA classification and BNP dramatically reduced (both with p < .01). Compared with biventricular pacing (BVP), LBBP could further improve QRSd, LVEF, LVEDD, and NYHA classification (all with p < .01). However, the pacing threshold at follow‐up was 0.06 V higher than that at baseline (p < .01), and the incidence of complications was 2.4%.
Conclusions
LBBP is effective and safe in heart failure patients with LBBB, whether it is better than BVP needs to be verified by randomized controlled trials.</description><subject>biventricular pacing</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - complications</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>cardiac resynchronization therapy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - complications</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>left bundle branch block</subject><subject>left bundle branch pacing</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90ctq3DAUBmBRGprJtJs-QBF0UwKeStbFVnfDkBsMpIt2bY7l445S2Z5KdobpKo_QZ8yTRMmkXbRQbQ6I7_wc-Al5y9mCp_dxCxYXXEqmXpAZV5JlJVfmJZkxLousFKU5Jicx3jDGNJPqFTkWstBaKDMjP9fYjrSe-sYjrQP0dkNTnuu_UdfTDUIYaQvOTwHT_-iwHyPduXFD_b-LtR_s9090SeM-jtglbmnAW4c7Cn1DOxzh_u4X9OD30cXX5KgFH_HN85yTr-dnX1aX2fr64mq1XGdWqEJltdBGF7VuOOQyR2OsNUxYQMaNZiIvtWhqIYAjVxoNogBVSyxAtKUEk4s5-XDI3Ybhx4RxrDoXLXoPPQ5TrHJlCllKLspE3_9Fb4YppHuT0nmRl1wwk9TpQdkwxBiwrbbBdRD2FWfVYyPVYyPVUyMJv3uOnOoOmz_0dwUJ8APYOY_7_0RVn5ers0PoA_BDlwU</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Cheng, Yuda</creator><creator>Wang, Zhanqi</creator><creator>Li, Yujun</creator><creator>Qi, Jinlei</creator><creator>Liu, Jinyu</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-9507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4937-2123</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Cheng, Yuda ; Wang, Zhanqi ; Li, Yujun ; Qi, Jinlei ; Liu, Jinyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-b36967b6d1a242e99cc903cae0196032863db33a1e156e9ee3a5b4e7a3f84a923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>biventricular pacing</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - complications</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>cardiac resynchronization therapy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - complications</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>left bundle branch block</topic><topic>left bundle branch pacing</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhanqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Jinlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Yuda</au><au>Wang, Zhanqi</au><au>Li, Yujun</au><au>Qi, Jinlei</au><au>Liu, Jinyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>212-218</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Background
The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect in CRT. This study aim to explore the efficacy and safety of LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, and CNKI databases for studies about LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB. QRS duration (QRSd), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pacing threshold and other related data were extracted and summarized.
Results
A total of 6 studies were included, and the success rate of LBBP was 93.2%. Compared with baseline, LBBP could shorten QRSd (MD = 61.23, 95% CI: 58.21–64.25, p < .01). Echocardiographic parameters including LVEF and LVEDD significantly improved (both with p < .01). Clinical outcomes including NYHA classification and BNP dramatically reduced (both with p < .01). Compared with biventricular pacing (BVP), LBBP could further improve QRSd, LVEF, LVEDD, and NYHA classification (all with p < .01). However, the pacing threshold at follow‐up was 0.06 V higher than that at baseline (p < .01), and the incidence of complications was 2.4%.
Conclusions
LBBP is effective and safe in heart failure patients with LBBB, whether it is better than BVP needs to be verified by randomized controlled trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34766359</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.14405</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-9507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4937-2123</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2022-02, Vol.45 (2), p.212-218 |
issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2597484138 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks |
subjects | biventricular pacing Bundle-Branch Block - complications Bundle-Branch Block - therapy Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods cardiac resynchronization therapy Classification Clinical trials Congestive heart failure Heart failure Heart Failure - complications Heart Failure - therapy Humans left bundle branch block left bundle branch pacing Meta-analysis Patients Ventricle |
title | Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A05%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Left%20bundle%20branch%20pacing%20in%20heart%20failure%20patients%20with%20left%20bundle%20branch%20block:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Cheng,%20Yuda&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=212-218&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.14405&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2597484138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-b36967b6d1a242e99cc903cae0196032863db33a1e156e9ee3a5b4e7a3f84a923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627281309&rft_id=info:pmid/34766359&rfr_iscdi=true |