Loading…

Dislocation rate, revisions and other complications of primary cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a single-center cohort study of 743 unselected hips with a mean 2.7-year follow-up

Introduction Evidence of whether to use hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is still widely debated, especially when taking ambulatory status, age, and patient cognitive status into account. The current study aims to report the rates of dislocat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2022-12, Vol.142 (12), p.3797-3802
Main Authors: Bue, Mats, Jakobsen, Stig Storgaard, Barckman, Jeppe, Tábori-Jensen, Steffan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Evidence of whether to use hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is still widely debated, especially when taking ambulatory status, age, and patient cognitive status into account. The current study aims to report the rates of dislocations, revisions and other complications for primary cemented HA in patients with displaced FNF. Materials and methods Single-center retrospective follow-up study of an unselected historic cohort. 743 consecutive hips (551 W and 192 M) at mean (SD) age of 83.6 (8.4) years received primary cemented HA for displaced FNF by posterolateral surgical approach between January 2012 and December 2019. Patient files and radiographs were evaluated for dislocations, revisions, and other complications until death or end of the follow-up period, and the educational level of the surgeon was noted. Results During a mean (SD) follow-up period of 2.7 (2.2) years, there were 6.1% ( n  = 45) dislocations, in which 82% (first dislocation) appeared within the first 30 postoperative days, and 51% ( n  = 23) of the dislocations requiring subsequent surgery. At the time of the last available follow-up, 57% ( n  = 421) of the patients were dead. A non-dislocation related revision was needed in 3.4% ( n  = 25) of the patients [in which infection accounted for 40% ( n  = 10) and traumatic periprosthetic fracture for 32% ( n  = 8)]. Thirty-day mortality was 9.2% and 1-year mortality 25.8%. There were no differences in patient's age, gender, or educational level of the surgeon between the dislocation and the no dislocation groups. Patients aged  70.
ISSN:1434-3916
0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s00402-021-04252-w