Loading…

Cruciferous vegetable and isothiocyanate intake and multiple health outcomes

•Consumption of cruciferous vegetables was associated with a reduced risk of cancer.•Per 100 g/d increment was associated with 10% decreased risk of all-cause mortality.•Warfarin resistance caused by vitamin K-rich broccoli was reported.•Caution was warranted for those allergies/hypersensitivities t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food chemistry 2022-05, Vol.375, p.131816-131816, Article 131816
Main Authors: Li, Ni, Wu, Xiaoting, Zhuang, Wen, Wu, Chuncheng, Rao, Zhiyong, Du, Liang, Zhou, Yong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Consumption of cruciferous vegetables was associated with a reduced risk of cancer.•Per 100 g/d increment was associated with 10% decreased risk of all-cause mortality.•Warfarin resistance caused by vitamin K-rich broccoli was reported.•Caution was warranted for those allergies/hypersensitivities to the Brassica genus. Isothiocyanates, bioactive phytochemicals of cruciferous vegetables, have chemopreventative efficacy. To clarify evidence of associations between cruciferous vegetable and isothiocyanate intake and various health outcomes, we conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews in humans. A total of 413 articles were identified, and 57 articles with 24 health outcomes were included. Consumption of cruciferous vegetables was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, cancers, and depression. Dose-response analyses revealed that a per 100 g/d increment was associated with a 10% decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality. Warfarin resistance caused by vitamin K-rich broccoli was reported. Caution was warranted for those allergies/hypersensitivities to the Brassica genus. The intake of cruciferous vegetables is generally safe and beneficial in humans. However the quality of the majority (68%) of evidence was low.
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131816