Science for Others or the Self? Presumed Motives for Science Shape Public Trust in Science

Science can improve life around the world, but public trust in science is at risk. Understanding the presumed motives of scientists and science can inform the social psychological underpinnings of public trust in science. Across five independent datasets, perceiving the motives of science and scient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality & social psychology bulletin 2023-03, Vol.49 (3), p.344-360
Main Authors: Benson-Greenwald, Tessa M., Trujillo, Alejandro, White, Andrew D., Diekman, Amanda B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Humans
Motivation
Prosocial behavior
Trust
Trust - psychology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Science can improve life around the world, but public trust in science is at risk. Understanding the presumed motives of scientists and science can inform the social psychological underpinnings of public trust in science. Across five independent datasets, perceiving the motives of science and scientists as prosocial promoted public trust in science. In Studies 1 and 2, perceptions that science was more prosocially oriented were associated with greater trust in science. Studies 3 and 4a & 4b employed experimental methods to establish that perceiving other-oriented motives, versus self-oriented motives, enhanced public trust in science. Respondents recommend greater funding allocations for science subdomains described as prosocially oriented versus power-oriented. Emphasizing the prosocial aspects of science can build stronger foundations of public trust in science.
ISSN:0146-1672
1552-7433
DOI:10.1177/01461672211064456