May the force be with you: understanding how patellofemoral joint reaction force compares across different activities and physical interventions—a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: British journal of sports medicine 2022-05, Vol.56 (9), p.521-530
• Main Authors: Hart, Harvi F, Patterson, Brooke E, Crossley, Kay M, Culvenor, Adam G, Khan, Michaela C M, King, Matthew G, Sritharan, Prasanna
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Approximation; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomechanics; exercises; Force; Humans; Knee; Knee Joint; Meta-analysis; osteoarthritis; Pain; Patellofemoral Joint; Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome; Posture; Review; Systematic review; Walking
• ISSN: 0306-3674; 1473-0480
• DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104686

ObjectiveTo systematically review and synthesise patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) in healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis (OA), during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises and with physical interventions (eg, foot orthotics, footwear, taping, bracing).DesignA systematic review with meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SportDiscus and Cochrane Library databases were searched.Eligibility criteriaObservational and interventional studies reporting PFJRF during everyday activities, therapeutic exercises, and physical interventions.ResultsIn healthy individuals, the weighted average of mean (±SD) peak PFJRF for everyday activities were: walking 0.9±0.4 body weight (BW), stair ascent 3.2±0.7 BW, stair descent 2.8±0.5 BW and running 5.2±1.2 BW. In those with patellofemoral pain, peak PFJRF were: walking 0.8±0.2 BW, stair ascent 2.5±0.5 BW, stair descent 2.6±0.5 BW, running 4.1±0.9 BW. Only single studies reported peak PFJRF during everyday activities in individuals with patellofemoral OA/articular cartilage defects (walking 1.3±0.5 BW, stair ascent 1.6±0.4 BW, stair descent 1.0±0.5 BW). The PFJRF was reported for many different exercises and physical interventions; however, considerable variability precluded any pooled estimates.SummaryEveryday activities and exercises involving larger knee flexion (eg, squatting) expose the patellofemoral joint to higher PFJRF than those involving smaller knee flexion (eg, walking). There were no discernable differences in peak PFJRF during everyday activities between healthy individuals and those with patellofemoral pain/OA. The information on PFJRF may be used to select appropriate variations of exercises and physical interventions.