Loading…

Direct radiation exposure of the eye lenses in cranial computed tomography and exposure reduction through radiographer training

Ionizing radiation can cause increased opacity of the lens and later lead to radiation-induced cataract. Therefore, the eye lens should be positioned outside of the direct radiation beam in cranial computed tomography (CCT). If this is not possible, protective measures must be taken, which includes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiography (London, England. 1995) England. 1995), 2022-08, Vol.28 (3), p.823-830
Main Authors: Daubner, D., Piwarz, L., Cerhova, J., Wahl, H., Linn, J., Gerber, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ionizing radiation can cause increased opacity of the lens and later lead to radiation-induced cataract. Therefore, the eye lens should be positioned outside of the direct radiation beam in cranial computed tomography (CCT). If this is not possible, protective measures must be taken, which includes the use of external lens protectors. In this study we assess whether direct radiation exposure of the eyes in CCT can be reduced by trained radiographers and whether the use of eye lens protectors improves after training. First, we evaluated 763 non-enhanced CCT regarding direct radiation exposure of eyeballs and eye lenses and usage of lens shielding. Afterwards, we trained radiographers to avoid radiation exposure of the eyes by head adjustment and protectors and assessed the improvements in a subsequent study of 678 CCT. We tried to identify factors that influenced radiation exposure of the eye lens. After training, frequency of radiation exposure of lenses was significantly reduced by 5.9% (220/763 patients in pre- vs. 155/678 patients in post-training group, p = 0.01). The use of external lens protectors significantly increased after training by 9.8% (37/763 patients in pre- vs. 99/678 patients in post-training group, p 
ISSN:1078-8174
1532-2831
DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2022.01.005