Loading…

Whole genome sequencing of isoniazid monoresistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals novel genetic polymorphisms

In an attempt to uncover genotypic indicators for isoniazid (INH) resistance in M. tuberculosis, in addition to the canonical mutations in genes associated with INH resistance, including katG, inhA and fabG promoter; we analyzed, two INH monoresistant isolates, ASTS24/13 (INHR1) and SHR1/14 (INHR2)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2022-03, Vol.133, p.102173-102173, Article 102173
Main Authors: Gupta, Shraddha, Kumar, Chanchal, Shrivastava, Kamal, Chauhan, Varsha, Singh, Anupriya, Arora, Rohan, Giri, Astha, Cabibbe, Andrea Maurizio, Sharma, Naresh Kumar, Spitaleri, Andrea, Cirillo, Daniela Maria, Bose, Mridula, Varma-Basil, Mandira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In an attempt to uncover genotypic indicators for isoniazid (INH) resistance in M. tuberculosis, in addition to the canonical mutations in genes associated with INH resistance, including katG, inhA and fabG promoter; we analyzed, two INH monoresistant isolates, ASTS24/13 (INHR1) and SHR1/14 (INHR2). Targeted Sanger sequencing detected a canonical mutation at katG315 only in INHR2. Infection of THP-1 cells and exposure to antituberculosis drugs led to two-fold increase in the minimum inhibitory concentration of INH in INHR2. Whole genome sequences revealed that INHR1 and INHR2 belonged to Delhi Central Asian Strain and East African Indian lineages, respectively. The sequences were compared with INH susceptible isolates with the same lineage as the INH monoresistant strains. INHR1 had a novel unique mutation STOP420Trp in the efflux pump gene Rv0849, while INHR2 had a novel mutation Arg579Ser in efflux pump gene mmpL5. Comparison of lipid associated genes showed novel mutations in INHR1 in fadE16, fadD3 and fbpD; while INHR2 had mutations in fadE1, Rv0145, Rv1425, fadD9 and mmaA3. Both isolates also demonstrated novel mutations in cell wall associated genes. Our study highlights the importance of searching for alternate mechanisms of INH resistance that may contribute to the development of more comprehensive diagnostic tools.
ISSN:1472-9792
1873-281X
DOI:10.1016/j.tube.2022.102173