Loading…

Electricity-driven ammonia oxidation and acetate production in microbial electrosynthesis systems

* MES was constructed for simultaneous ammonia removal and acetate production. * Energy consumption was different for total nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen removal. * Energy consumption for acetate production was about 0.04 kWh/g. * Nitrate accumulation explained the difference of energy consumption....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers of environmental science & engineering 2022-04, Vol.16 (4), p.42-42, Article 42
Main Authors: Liang, Qinjun, Gao, Yu, Li, Zhigang, Cai, Jiayi, Chu, Na, Hao, Wen, Jiang, Yong, Zeng, Raymond Jianxiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:* MES was constructed for simultaneous ammonia removal and acetate production. * Energy consumption was different for total nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen removal. * Energy consumption for acetate production was about 0.04 kWh/g. * Nitrate accumulation explained the difference of energy consumption. * Transport of ammonia and acetate across the membrane deteriorated the performance. Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is an emerging technology for producing chemicals, and coupling MES to anodic waste oxidation can simultaneously increase the competitiveness and allow additional functions to be explored. In this study, MES was used for the simultaneous removal of ammonia from synthetic urine and production of acetate from CO 2. Using graphite anode, 83.2%±5.3% ammonia removal and 28.4%±9.9% total nitrogen removal was achieved, with an energy consumption of 1.32 kWh/g N for total nitrogen removal, 0.45 kWh/g N for ammonia nitrogen removal, and 0.044 kWh/g for acetate production. Using boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode, 70.9%±12.1% ammonia removal and 51.5%±11.8% total nitrogen removal was obtained, with an energy consumption of 0.84 kWh/g N for total nitrogen removal, 0.61 kWh/g N for ammonia nitrogen removal, and 0.043 kWh/g for acetate production. A difference in nitrate accumulation explained the difference of total nitrogen removal efficiencies. Transport of ammonia and acetate across the membrane deteriorated the performance of MES. These results are important for the development of novel electricity-driven technologies for chemical production and pollution removal.
ISSN:2095-2201
2095-221X
DOI:10.1007/s11783-021-1476-5