Loading…

Bone Regeneration Exploiting Corticoperiosteal Tissue Transfer for Scaffold-Guided Bone Regeneration

Contemporary reconstructive approaches for critical size bone defects carry significant disadvantages. As a result, clinically driven research has focused on the development and translation of alternative therapeutic concepts. Scaffold-guided tissue regeneration (SGTR) is an emerging technique to he...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods Methods, 2022-05, Vol.28 (5), p.22-213
Main Authors: Sparks, David S, Medeiros Savi, Flavia, Saifzadeh, Siamak, Wille, Marie-Luise, Wagels, Michael, Hutmacher, Dietmar W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Contemporary reconstructive approaches for critical size bone defects carry significant disadvantages. As a result, clinically driven research has focused on the development and translation of alternative therapeutic concepts. Scaffold-guided tissue regeneration (SGTR) is an emerging technique to heal critical size bone defects. However, issues synchronizing scaffold vascularization with bone-specific regenerative processes currently limit bone regeneration for extra large (XL, 19 cm 3 ) critical bone defects. To address this issue, we developed a large animal model that incorporates a corticoperiosteal flap (CPF) for sustained scaffold neovascularization and bone regeneration. In 10 sheep, we demonstrated the efficacy of this approach for healing medium (M, 9 cm 3 ) size critical bone defects as demonstrated on plain radiography, microcomputed tomography, and histology. Furthermore, in two sheep, we demonstrate how this approach can be safely extended to heal XL critical size defects. This article presents an original CPF technique in a well-described preclinical model, which can be used in conjunction with the SGTR concept, to address challenging critical size bone defects in vivo .
ISSN:1937-3384
1937-3392
DOI:10.1089/ten.tec.2022.0015