Loading…

Accuracy of ASTA MicroIDSys, a new matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry system, for the identification of Korean reference and clinical bacterial and yeast strains

This study compared the accuracy of a new MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry system, ASTA MicroIDSys system, with that of MALDI Biotyper system for the identification of reference and clinical bacterial and yeast strains. The identification accuracy of the 2 systems was compared using a total of 406 strain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2022-05, Vol.103 (1), p.115658-115658, Article 115658
Main Authors: Ko, Young Jin, Lee, O Jin, Lee, Seul-Bi, Kim, Choon-Mee, Lee, Jaehyeon, Kook, Joong-Ki, Park, Soon-Nang, Shin, Jong Hee, Kim, Soo Hyun, Won, Eun Jeong, Park, Geon, Kang, Seong-Ho, Jang, Sook-Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study compared the accuracy of a new MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry system, ASTA MicroIDSys system, with that of MALDI Biotyper system for the identification of reference and clinical bacterial and yeast strains. The identification accuracy of the 2 systems was compared using a total of 406 strains comprising 142 aerobic and 180 anaerobic bacterial strains and 84 yeast strains. The genus and species identification rates were 98.0% and 89.4% using MicroIDSys and 96.1% and 89.4% using Biotyper, respectively. The species identification rates of MicroIDSys and Biotyper for aerobic bacteria were 93.0% and 97.2%, respectively, and those for anaerobic bacteria were 85.6% and 81.7%, respectively. The accuracy of yeast identification at the species level was 91.7% using MicroIDSys and 92.9% using Biotyper. These findings indicate that MicroIDSys could be useful for the accurate identification of bacteria and yeast in clinical microbiology laboratories.
ISSN:0732-8893
1879-0070
DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115658