Loading…

Arterial Blood Gases and Arterial Lines in the Prehospital Setting: A Systematic Literature Review and Survey of Current United Kingdom Helicopter Emergency Medical Services

Prehospital guidelines state that monitoring should match in-hospital standards, but consensus on the use of arterial blood gases (ABGs) and arterial lines remains unclear. The aim was to perform a systematic literature review and survey of UK helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) use and per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Air medical journal 2022-03, Vol.41 (2), p.201-208
Main Authors: Morton, Sarah, Avery, Pascale, Payne, Jessie, OMeara, Matthew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prehospital guidelines state that monitoring should match in-hospital standards, but consensus on the use of arterial blood gases (ABGs) and arterial lines remains unclear. The aim was to perform a systematic literature review and survey of UK helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) use and perceptions of ABGs and arterial lines. A systematic literature review was conducted for arterial lines and ABGs and prehospital care. Additionally, two questionnaires were distributed to all UK HEMS (questionnaire 1: current clinical practice and questionnaire 2: clinicians’ opinions). From 1,028 results, 13 studies (10 ABGs and 3 arterial lines) were included, demonstrating it is feasible to obtain ABGs and place arterial lines in the prehospital setting. There were concerns about practical difficulties for ABGs and the time taken for arterial lines. Survey responses were obtained from all UK HEMS (N = 22). Six services carry equipment for performing ABGs and nine services for arterial lines. Clinicians expressed concerns relating to the time taken to perform both procedures, but most believed it would allow better monitoring and more targeted treatment. The evidence of benefit for both procedures remains poor. Overall, there may be clinical benefits, but these are likely to be patient specific and require further investigation.
ISSN:1067-991X
1532-6497
DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2021.11.008