Vector Angle Analysis of Multimodal Neuromonitoring Data for Continuous Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia

• Published in: Neurocritical care 2022-08, Vol.37 (Suppl 2), p.230-236
• Main Authors: Megjhani, Murad, Weiss, Miriam, Kwon, Soon Bin, Ford, Jenna, Nametz, Daniel, Kastenholz, Nick, Fogel, Hart, Velazquez, Angela, Roh, David, Agarwal, Sachin, Connolly, E. Sander, Claassen, Jan, Schubert, Gerrit A., Park, Soojin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Aneurysms; Arterial lines; Big Data in Neurocritical Care; Brain Ischemia - diagnosis; Cerebral Infarction; Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology; Classification; Critical Care Medicine; Data analysis; Humans; Intensive; Intensive care; Internal Medicine; Intracranial Pressure; Ischemia; Machine learning; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neural networks; Neurology; Neurosurgery; Patients; Physiology; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Time series; Vital signs
• ISSN: 1541-6933; 1556-0961
• DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01481-8

Background Dysfunctional cerebral autoregulation often precedes delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Currently, there are no data-driven techniques that leverage this information to predict DCI in real time. Our hypothesis is that information using continuous updated analyses of multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation can be deployed to predict DCI. Methods Time series values of intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygenation, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), optimal CPP (CPPOpt), ΔCPP (CPP − CPPOpt), mean arterial pressure, and pressure reactivity index were combined and summarized as vectors. A validated temporal signal angle measurement was modified into a classification algorithm that incorporates hourly data. The time-varying temporal signal angle measurement (TTSAM) algorithm classifies DCI at varying time points by vectorizing and computing the angle between the test and reference time signals. The patient is classified as DCI+ if the error between the time-varying test vector and DCI+ reference vector is smaller than that between the time-varying test vector and DCI− reference vector. Finally, prediction at time point t is calculated as the majority voting over all the available signals. The leave-one-patient-out cross-validation technique was used to train and report the performance of the algorithms. The TTSAM and classifier performance was determined by balanced accuracy, F 1 score, true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative over time. Results One hundred thirty-one patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent multimodal neuromonitoring were identified from two centers (Columbia University: 52 [39.7%], Aachen University: 79 [60.3%]) and included in the analysis. Sixty-four (48.5%) patients had DCI, and DCI was diagnosed 7.2 ± 3.3 days after hemorrhage. The TTSAM algorithm achieved a balanced accuracy of 67.3% and an F 1 score of 0.68 at 165 h (6.9 days) from bleed day with a true positive of 0.83, false positive of 0.16, true negative of 0.51, and false negative of 0.49. Conclusions A TTSAM algorithm using multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation calculations shows promise to classify DCI in real time.