Loading…

Untargeted metabolomics and proteomics approach using liquid chromatography-Orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry to detect pork adulteration in Pangasius hypopthalmus meat

•Potential metabolite markers of pork and PHM were found using chemometrics.•Pork proteins and metabolites in PHM mixtures could be identified using an untargeted proteomic and metabolomic approach.•This application could be used for other meat-based discovery approaches.•This technique could be use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food chemistry 2022-08, Vol.386, p.132856-132856, Article 132856
Main Authors: Windarsih, Anjar, Suratno, Warmiko, Hendy Dwi, Indrianingsih, Anastasia Wheni, Rohman, Abdul, Ulumuddin, Yaya Ihya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Potential metabolite markers of pork and PHM were found using chemometrics.•Pork proteins and metabolites in PHM mixtures could be identified using an untargeted proteomic and metabolomic approach.•This application could be used for other meat-based discovery approaches.•This technique could be used as template methodology for identification of meat adulteration. Pangasius hypopthalmus is well known as a good source of protein. However, Pangasius hypopthalmus meat (PHM) can be adulterated with pork for economic concern, thus, analytical methods for authentication are required. Untargeted metabolomics and proteomics using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) and chemometrics of principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was successfully used to differentiate authentic and adulterated PHM with the good of fitness (R > 0.95) and good of predictivity (Q > 0.5). Metabolites of PC(o-18:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)) was found to be a potential marker for pork whereas DMPC (dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine) was a potential marker for PHM. Meanwhile, pork peptide marker of myoglobin (HPGDFGADAQGAMSK) and β-hemoglobin (FFESFGDLSNADAVMGNPK) could be identified. Both metabolomics and proteomics using LC-HRMS could detect pork at the lowest concentration level (0.5% w/w). In conclusion, untargeted metabolomics and proteomics using LC-HRMS in combination with chemometrics could be used as powerful methods to detect pork adulteration in fish meat.
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132856