Loading…

Evaluation of the efficiency of the systemic immune‐inflammation index in differentiating parapneumonic effusion from empyema

Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of the systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII) and other biomarkers in distinguishing parapneumonic effusion (PPE) and empyema. Methods Patients who were thought to have pleural effusion secondary to pneumonia in the pediatric emergency department (PED) between 200...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric pulmonology 2022-07, Vol.57 (7), p.1625-1630
Main Authors: Güneylioğlu, Muhammed M., Güngör, Ali, Göktuğ, Aytaç, Üner, Çiğdem, Bodur, İlknur, Yaradılmış, Raziye M., Öztürk, Betül, Şen, Zeynep S., Tuygun, Nilden
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of the systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII) and other biomarkers in distinguishing parapneumonic effusion (PPE) and empyema. Methods Patients who were thought to have pleural effusion secondary to pneumonia in the pediatric emergency department (PED) between 2004 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups as empyema and PPE. The efficacy of infection markers in predicting empyema was compared. Results Fifty‐nine patients (59.3% male) were included in the study. Forty‐three (72.9%) patients were in the PPE and 16 (27.1%) were in the empyema group. Length of hospital stay and pleural fluid thickness measured with thoracic ultrasonography were significantly higher in the empyema group (p = 0.018 and p = 0.002, respectively). The mean SII was 1902.73 ± 1588.87 in PPE patients, while it was 6899.98 ± 6678 in empyema patients (p = 0.009). C‐reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ​​were significantly higher in the empyema group; absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and lymphocyte‐monocytes ratio (LMR) were significantly lower than the PPE group. When the best cut‐off values of inflammation markers are determined according to the area under the curve, the highest odds ratios suggesting empyema were found in SII, LMR, CRP, and ANC, respectively. Conclusion Inflammation markers can be useful in predicting empyema. The best markers were found to be SII, LMR, CRP, and ANC. High SII is one of the practical diagnostic markers that can be used differentiate empyema from PPE in PED.
ISSN:8755-6863
1099-0496
DOI:10.1002/ppul.25926