Loading…

Automated quantitative assessment of amorphous calcifications: Towards improved malignancy risk stratification

Amorphous calcifications noted on mammograms (i.e., small and indistinct calcifications that are difficult to characterize) are associated with high diagnostic uncertainty, often leading to biopsies. Yet, only 20% of biopsied amorphous calcifications are cancer. We present a quantitative approach fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in biology and medicine 2022-07, Vol.146, p.105504-105504, Article 105504
Main Authors: Marathe, Kalyani, Marasinou, Chrysostomos, Li, Beibin, Nakhaei, Noor, Li, Bo, Elmore, Joann G., Shapiro, Linda, Hsu, William
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Amorphous calcifications noted on mammograms (i.e., small and indistinct calcifications that are difficult to characterize) are associated with high diagnostic uncertainty, often leading to biopsies. Yet, only 20% of biopsied amorphous calcifications are cancer. We present a quantitative approach for distinguishing between benign and actionable (high-risk and malignant) amorphous calcifications using a combination of local textures, global spatial relationships, and interpretable handcrafted expert features. Our approach was trained and validated on a set of 168 2D full-field digital mammography exams (248 images) from 168 patients. Within these 248 images, we identified 276 image regions with segmented amorphous calcifications and a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis. A set of local (radiomic and region measurements) and global features (distribution and expert-defined) were extracted from each image. Local features were grouped using an unsupervised k-means clustering algorithm. All global features were concatenated with clustered local features and used to train a LightGBM classifier to distinguish benign from actionable cases. On the held-out test set of 60 images, our approach achieved a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 35%, and a positive predictive value of 38% when the decision threshold was set to 0.4. Given that all of the images in our test set resulted in a recommendation of a biopsy, the use of our algorithm would have identified 15 images (25%) that were benign, potentially reducing the number of breast biopsies. Quantitative analysis of full-field digital mammograms can extract subtle shape, texture, and distribution features that may help to distinguish between benign and actionable amorphous calcifications. •A clustering-based approach improves the assessment of amorphous calcifications.•Unsupervised clustering identifies a consistent set of local shape and texture-based features.•Global features like variation in microcalcification size and spatial distribution predict high risk/malignant cases.•Quantitative analysis of the calcifications and their surroundings helps distinguish between benign versus actionable cases.
ISSN:0010-4825
1879-0534
DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105504