Loading…
T1G1 Bladder Cancer: Prognosis for this Rare Pathological Diagnosis Within the Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Spectrum
Time to progression of stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer was comparable to that for T1G2 but not TaG1 cancer. Therefore, our results suggest that primary T1G1 carcinomas should be managed with more aggressive treatment and more frequent follow-up than for low-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder ca...
Saved in:
Published in: | European urology focus 2022-11, Vol.8 (6), p.1627-1634 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Time to progression of stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer was comparable to that for T1G2 but not TaG1 cancer. Therefore, our results suggest that primary T1G1 carcinomas should be managed with more aggressive treatment and more frequent follow-up than for low-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
The pathological existence and clinical consequence of stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer are the subject of debate. Even though the diagnosis of T1G1 is controversial, several reports have consistently found a prevalence of 2–6% G1 in their T1 series. However, it remains unclear if T1G1 carcinomas have added value as a separate category to predict prognosis within the non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) spectrum.
To evaluate the prognostic value of T1G1 carcinomas compared to TaG1 and T1G2 carcinomas within the NMIBC spectrum.
Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta and T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals in Europe and Canada were analyzed. Transurethral resection (TUR) was performed between 1990 and 2018.
Time to recurrence and progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models stratified by institution.
T1G1 represented 1.9% (99/5170) of all carcinomas and 5.3% (99/1859) of T1 carcinomas. According to primary TUR dates, the proportion of T1G1 varied between 0.9% and 3.5% per year, with similar percentages in the early and later calendar years. We found no difference in time to recurrence between T1G1 and TaG1 (p = 0.91) or between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Time to progression significantly differed between TaG1 and T1G1 (p < 0.001) but not between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results.
The relative prevalence of T1G1 diagnosis was low and remained constant over the past three decades. Time to recurrence of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for other stage/grade NMIBC combinations. Time to progression of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for T1G2 but not for TaG1, suggesting that treatment and surveillance of T1G1 carcinomas should be more like the approaches for T1G2 NMIBC in accordance with the intermediate and/or high risk categories of the European Association of Urology NMIBC guidelines.
Although rare, stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer is still diagnosed in daily clinical practice. Using individual patient data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada, we found that time to progression of T1G1 cancer w |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2405-4569 2405-4569 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.014 |