Loading…

Species limits and introgression in Pimelodus from the Magdalena-Cauca River basin

[Display omitted] •Phylogenetic hypothesis of Pimelodus yuma, Pimelodus grosskopfii, Pimelodus crypticus.•Pimelodus yuma, P. grosskopfii and P. crypticus are independently evolving species.•Pimelodus yuma and P. grosskopfii show evidence of historical genetic introgression.•No signals of current gen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 2022-08, Vol.173, p.107517-107517, Article 107517
Main Authors: Martínez, José Gregorio, Rangel-Medrano, José David, Yepes-Acevedo, Anny Johanna, Restrepo-Escobar, Natalia, Márquez, Edna Judith
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Phylogenetic hypothesis of Pimelodus yuma, Pimelodus grosskopfii, Pimelodus crypticus.•Pimelodus yuma, P. grosskopfii and P. crypticus are independently evolving species.•Pimelodus yuma and P. grosskopfii show evidence of historical genetic introgression.•No signals of current geneflow exist between P. yuma and P. grosskopfii. Low morphological differentiation among taxa hampers their appropriate identification, basic biological studies and promotion of any conservation effort. Aiming to provide the first insight into the evolution and speciation among north-western South American members of Pimelodus, this study tested the hypothesis that Pimelodus yuma, Pimelodus grosskopfii and Pimelodus crypticus represent three independently evolving species and explored signals of interspecific hybridisation. The outcomes based on mitochondrial (cox1) and nuclear (RADseq, microsatellites and rag2) markers combined with coalescence-based and allele-frequency methods confirmed that each studied species represents an independently evolving unit. Contrary to expectations, P. yuma was found as a sister clade of P. blochii, while P. crypticus (formerly confused with P. blochii) was phylogenetically closer to P. grosskopfii. We also found strong evidence of ancient introgression (0.66–3.32 mya) between the non-sibling species P. yuma and P. grosskopfii, breaking the absence of interbreeding and the independent evolutionary trajectory among north-western South American Pimelodus during their diversification history, a pre-requisite to define species limits. However, there were non-significant values of current gene flow between them, supporting the hypothesis of full isolation.
ISSN:1055-7903
1095-9513
DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107517