Loading…

Inspiratory Muscle Training Strategies in Tracheostomized Critically Ill Individuals

Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) strategies can reduce ICU length of stay and optimize recovery in critically ill patients. Our objective was to compare IMT combined with spontaneous breathing with T-piece in tracheostomized subjects. Tracheostomized critically ill subjects who were ready to wean w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory care 2022-08, Vol.67 (8), p.939-948
Main Authors: Roceto Ratti, Lígia Dos Santos, Marques Tonella, Rodrigo, Castilho de Figueir do, Luciana, Bredda Saad, Ivete Alonso, Eiras Falcão, Antonio Luis, Martins de Oliveira, Pedro Paulo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) strategies can reduce ICU length of stay and optimize recovery in critically ill patients. Our objective was to compare IMT combined with spontaneous breathing with T-piece in tracheostomized subjects. Tracheostomized critically ill subjects who were ready to wean were selected and randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: electronically-assisted IMT (EIMT) or spontaneous breathing with T-piece. Electronically assisted IMT was delivered using 30% of maximal inspiratory pressure (manual EIMT or automatically adjusted loads). The following variables were analyzed: ICU length of stay, weaning time, maximal inspiratory pressure, rapid shallow breathing index, pressure (cm H O), power (W), flow (L/s), volume (L), and energy (J). A total of 132 patients were assessed; 104 subjects were enrolled with EIMT, 51 (automatic EIMT, 25 and manual EIMT 26), or spontaneous breathing with T-piece group, 53. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was significantly higher = .02) in subjects in the manual EIMT group. Weaning time did not differ significantly between groups (8.55 ± 6.48 d and 10.86 ± 6.48 d, EIMT and spontaneous breathing with T-piece group, respectively; = .23). Weaning success rates (75%) were lower in the manual EIMT group. Invasive mechanical ventilation time was longer but not significantly different ( = .21) in the spontaneous breathing with T-piece group. Maximal inspiratory pressure was significantly higher in the spontaneous breathing with T-piece and the automatic EIMT groups ( < .001 and = .007, respectively). Pressure, power, and energy values were significantly higher in the manual EIMT group ( < .001, = .003, and = .003, respectively). IMT modalities in this trial had no significant impacts on weaning time or successful weaning rates.
ISSN:0020-1324
1943-3654
DOI:10.4187/respcare.08733