Application of offset Dingo instruments in Anterior to Psoas (ATP)/Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) procedure: A retrospective study of 80 patients

• Published in: Neuro-chirurgie 2022-12, Vol.68 (6), p.575-582
• Main Authors: Song, Z., Zhu, G., Liang, Z., Zhang, P., Ge, Z., Lin, S., Wang, X., Yu, X., Tang, J., Ren, H., Liang, D., Cui, J., Jiang, X.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anterior to psoas; Minimally invasive lumbar fusion; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Psoas muscle
• ISSN: 0028-3770; 1773-0619
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2022.05.005

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive lumbar fusion procedure that has flourished in recent years. However, complications related to the anterior-to-psoas (ATP) approach have been reported. The purpose of this study was to assess the OLIF technique using offset design “Dingo” instruments for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disorders. A retrospective review was performed to identify patients between March 2018 and November 2020 who underwent OLIF with conventional or modified instruments with a minimum follow-up of 12months. Demographic data were recorded. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were compared between cohorts. Imaging parameters were measured and compared between cohorts before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes were assessed at each follow-up visit. All complications were reviewed. A total of 80 consecutive patients were included. The mean follow-up times for the conventional group and modified group were 14.5months and 16.3months, respectively. The incidence of hip flexion weakness was 27.5% and 7.5% for the conventional cohort and modified cohort, respectively. The modified group was associated with a shorter operation time, shorter length of hospital stay, higher postoperative disk height and better cage position. The symptoms of all patients improved after surgery. At 1-week follow-up, the modified group showed significantly better clinical scores. OLIF with modified instruments and techniques shows promising outcomes in reducing approach-related complications. Additionally, the modified technique is associated with a better cage position, shorter length of hospital stay and less postoperative pain in the early period.