Loading…
Is there a sex gap in outcomes of comparable patients supported with left ventricular assist devices?
Objectives Historically, females were described as suffering from worse outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, females' preoperative conditions are unique, making direct comparisons with males challenging. This study aimed to select through propensity score...
Saved in:
Published in: | Artificial organs 2022-11, Vol.46 (11), p.2293-2303 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
Historically, females were described as suffering from worse outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, females' preoperative conditions are unique, making direct comparisons with males challenging. This study aimed to select through propensity score (PS) matching two preoperatively comparable populations of females and males and test if any real sex‐related difference exists regarding survival and adverse events after LVAD implantation.
Methods
This retrospective single‐center observational study investigated patients who received LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2018. PS matching was applied to balance preoperative heterogeneity between males and females. Primary endpoint was survival at follow‐up. Secondary endpoints included perioperative outcomes and LVAD‐related adverse events.
Results
92 fully comparable females(n = 46) and males(n = 46) were selected after PS matching (median age:57 years, min–max:18–75). 26.1% of patients required preoperative mechanical circulatory support. Females needed more intraoperative fresh frozen plasma (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0160-564X 1525-1594 |
DOI: | 10.1111/aor.14333 |