Loading…

Real-world implementation evaluation of an electronic health record-integrated consumer informatics tool that collects patient-generated contextual data

Use the RE-AIM framework to examine the implementation of a patient contextual data (PCD) Tool designed to share patients’ needs, values, and preferences with care teams ahead of clinical encounters. Observational study that follows initial PCD Tool scaling across primary care at a Midwestern academ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2022-09, Vol.165, p.104810-104810, Article 104810
Main Authors: Holt, Jeana M., Spanbauer, Charles, Cusatis, Rachel, Winn, Aaron N., Talsma, AkkeNeel, Asan, Onur, Somai, Melek, Hanson, Ryan, Moore, Jennifer, Makoul, Gregory, Crotty, Bradley H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Use the RE-AIM framework to examine the implementation of a patient contextual data (PCD) Tool designed to share patients’ needs, values, and preferences with care teams ahead of clinical encounters. Observational study that follows initial PCD Tool scaling across primary care at a Midwestern academic health network. Program invitations, enrollment, patient submissions, and clinician views were tracked over a 1-year study period. Logistic regression modeled the likelihood of using the PCD Tool, accounting for patient covariates. Of 58,874 patients who could be contacted by email, 9,183 (15.6%) became PCD Tool users. Overall, 76% of primary care providers had patients who used the PCD Tool. Older age, female gender, non-minority race, patient portal activation, and Medicare coverage were significantly associated with increased likelihood of use. Number of office visits, medical issues, and behavioral health conditions also associated with use. Primary care staff viewed 18.7% of available PCD Tool summaries, 1.1% to 57.6% per clinic. The intervention mainly reached non-minority patients and patients who used more health services. Given the requirement for an email address on file, some patients may have been underrepresented. Overall, patient reach and adoption and clinician adoption, implementation, and maintenance of this Tool were modest but stable, consistent with a non-directive approach to fostering adoption by introducing the Tool in the absence of clear expectations for use. Healthcare organizations must implement effective methods to increase the reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of PCD tools across all patient populations. Assisting people, particularly racial minorities, with PCD Tool registration and actively supporting clinician use are critical steps in implementing technology that facilitates care.
ISSN:1386-5056
1872-8243
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104810