Loading…

Discrimination of Atlantic salmon origins using untargeted chemical fingerprinting

[Display omitted] •Small-molecular features in Atlantic salmon were acquired using LC-HRMS.•Origin discrimination was accomplished using untargeted fingerprinting.•95 candidate markers of origins were selected by univariate analyses.•37 confirmed markers were related to feed formulations and environ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food chemistry 2022-11, Vol.394, p.133538-133538, Article 133538
Main Authors: Chang, Wen-Hsin, Soon Ling, Yee, Wang, Ko-Chih, Nan, Fan-Hua, Chen, Wen-Ling
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Small-molecular features in Atlantic salmon were acquired using LC-HRMS.•Origin discrimination was accomplished using untargeted fingerprinting.•95 candidate markers of origins were selected by univariate analyses.•37 confirmed markers were related to feed formulations and environment adaptation.•None of the markers were residues or contaminants of potential food safety concern. Mislabelling the geographic origin of same-species aquaculture products is difficult to identify. This study applied untargeted small-molecule fingerprinting to discriminating between Atlantic salmon originating from Chile and Norway. The acquired liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry data from Chilean (n = 32) and Norwegian (n = 29) salmon were chemometrically processed. The partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models successfully discriminated between Chilean and Norwegian salmon at both positive and negative ionisation modes (R2 > 0.96, Q2 > 0.81). Univariate analyses facilitated the selection of approximately 100 candidate markers with high statistical confidence (> 95%). Of these, 37 confirmed markers of Chilean and Norwegian salmon were primarily associated with feed formulations, including lipid derivatives and feed additives. None of the markers were residues or contaminants of potential food safety concern.
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133538