Loading…

Thermoformed glass fiber reinforced polypropylene: Microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses

The objective of this work was to characterize the microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses in glass fiber reinforced polypropylene (PP) composites with respect to the thermoforming parameters and as a function of the fiber‐matrix interface quality. First, differential scanning ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polymer composites 1998-06, Vol.19 (3), p.301-309
Main Authors: Youssef, Y., Denault, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this work was to characterize the microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses in glass fiber reinforced polypropylene (PP) composites with respect to the thermoforming parameters and as a function of the fiber‐matrix interface quality. First, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to investigate the crystallization behavior of the PP matrix. Second, short beam shear tests and tensile tests in the ±45° directions have been conducted to characterize respectively the interfacial strength and the matrix properties in the composites. Finally, residual stresses were measured via the curvatures of unsymmetric cross‐plied laminates. The cooling rate was found to be a critical parameter of the molding process since the matrix crystallization temperature, the interfacial strength as well as the residual stresses showed large variations with various cooling rates. At slow cooling, the crystallization process initiates at higher temperatures and covers longer time periods resulting in more spherulitical matrix structures. In this case, the composites becomes stiffer but also fragile indicating a decrease in the stress transfer efficiency at the interface level. This effect was also observed in the improved interface system, suggesting that the fiber‐matrix interaction operates through the amorphous phase surrounding the fibers. The fiber‐matrix interface improvement was accompanied by an increase in residual stresses, possibly due to the inhibition of some stress relief mechanism.
ISSN:0272-8397
1548-0569
DOI:10.1002/pc.10103