Empathy in health professions education: What works, gaps and areas for improvement

• Published in: Medical education 2023-01, Vol.57 (1), p.86-101
• Main Authors: Samarasekera, Dujeepa D., Lee, Shuh Shing, Yeo, Jillian H. T., Yeo, Su Ping, Ponnamperuma, Gominda
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Education, Medical; Empathy; Health Occupations; Humans; Medical education; Medical students; Pedagogy; Problem-Based Learning; Skills
• ISSN: 0308-0110; 1365-2923
• DOI: 10.1111/medu.14865

Introduction Developing a physician equipped with both technical and affective skills is crucial in ensuring quality patient care. Of these skills, nurturing empathy is a key skill that has been studied in great detail, particularly among medical undergraduates. Despite numerous studies trending the changes in empathy, the results are often contradictory or confusing. Our study aims to find what interventions are effective to inculcate empathy in both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education and suggest areas for improvement. Methods A narrative review was conducted on the interventions in nurturing empathy in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Original research articles and systematic reviews with clear interventions and outcomes were included in the study. Results A total of 44 articles were reviewed. About 44% (n = 18) of the studies used a mixture of different approaches as their interventions. Some interventions were anchored by specific topics: Seven papers focusing on communication skills, three papers on humanities, and three on arts. A majority of the interventions (60%; n = 26) were implemented over a span of time as compared to studies which suggested a one‐off intervention (30%; n = 12). Of the 26 papers in which the interventions were enforced over a period of time, 62% (n = 16) indicated an increase in student empathy whereas 16% (n = 4) indicated no changes in empathy post‐intervention. On the contrary, 50% (n = 6) of the one‐off interventions revealed no significant change in student empathy. Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) is widely used in measuring student empathy postintervention, but approximately 41% of the studies included measuring tools other than JSE. Conclusions Pedagogical methods that invoke thought processes related to the affective domain of learning and experiential learning are more effective than the didactic methods of teaching and learning. Multimodal mixed‐methods approach that combine different pedagogical interventions is more likely to bring about the desired results. Got empathy? Samarasekera et al.'s narrative review indicates that how interventions aimed at improving empathy are implemented determines their outcome while drawing attention to the value of time and context.