Loading…

Can Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery be Omitted in Elderly Patients with Early-Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer? A Population-Based Study and Proposed Nomogram

Introduction We aimed to evaluate whether radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be omitted in elderly patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Methods Patients aged 65 years and older with T1–2N0–1, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer in 2010–2015...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in therapy 2022-10, Vol.39 (10), p.4707-4722
Main Authors: Xu, Li, Zhou, Chen, Qiu, Juanjuan, Lv, Qing, Du, Zhenggui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-e3d30a8cb8c782fb206496bafc33b0948741be3115c8ef4aeec6c4a950012b743
container_end_page 4722
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4707
container_title Advances in therapy
container_volume 39
creator Xu, Li
Zhou, Chen
Qiu, Juanjuan
Lv, Qing
Du, Zhenggui
description Introduction We aimed to evaluate whether radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be omitted in elderly patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Methods Patients aged 65 years and older with T1–2N0–1, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer in 2010–2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline of different groups. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier plot and log-rank test. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariate Cox analysis. A nomogram predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and a risk stratification model were constructed and validated. Results A total of 4465 patients were included and 27.7% (1237/4465) patients did not receive postoperative RT. RT was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.552 P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12325-022-02279-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2702192913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2702192913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-e3d30a8cb8c782fb206496bafc33b0948741be3115c8ef4aeec6c4a950012b743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSAwR_5cE5ou1ooUtWuuiBxsxxnkqZK7GA7Rflp_Xd42YUjh9FIM--8Y8-D0BtGPzBKy4-BccFzQjk_RFmR5RlaMVnkJAV_jla0zBjhQv44Q-chPFDKaZnLl-hM5FUuiiJfoaeNtvhON72L9-D1tOB1G8HjSw86RLJxNoB_7G2H97PvwC-4Bnw79jFCg3uLt0MDfljwTscebAz4Vx_v8VanGtlH3cF7fOX86CyQOzAwRefxDXRJ_QinJTg9wYD_hNd456Z5SD1nyaUOacM-zs2CtW3wzrvJHUo3bnSd1-Mr9KLVQ4DXp3yBvn_efttckevbL18362tiOJeRgGgE1dLU0pSStzWnRVYVtW6NEDWtMpluVINgLDcS2kwDmMJkusopZbwuM3GB3h19J-9-zhCiGvtgYBi0BTcHxUvKWcUrJpKUH6XGuxA8tGry_aj9ohhVB2TqiEwlXOoPMrWkobcn_7keofk38pdREoijIKSWTQzUg5u9TX_-n-1vfW6lew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702192913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery be Omitted in Elderly Patients with Early-Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer? A Population-Based Study and Proposed Nomogram</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Xu, Li ; Zhou, Chen ; Qiu, Juanjuan ; Lv, Qing ; Du, Zhenggui</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li ; Zhou, Chen ; Qiu, Juanjuan ; Lv, Qing ; Du, Zhenggui</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction We aimed to evaluate whether radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be omitted in elderly patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Methods Patients aged 65 years and older with T1–2N0–1, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer in 2010–2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline of different groups. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier plot and log-rank test. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariate Cox analysis. A nomogram predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and a risk stratification model were constructed and validated. Results A total of 4465 patients were included and 27.7% (1237/4465) patients did not receive postoperative RT. RT was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.552 P  &lt; 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.559, P  &lt; 0.001) in the matched cohort. The same results were found after adjusting independent risk factors by multivariate analysis. On the basis of the nomogram predicting BCSS of patients without RT by incorporating independent risk factors (age, race, HER2 status, T stage, and N stage), we built a risk stratification model which indicated that RT improved OS (HR = 0.511, P  &lt; 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.517, P  &lt; 0.001) in the high-risk group (total score &gt; 150), but not in the low-risk group (total score ≤ 120). The C-index and all calibration curves demonstrated sufficient accuracies and good predictive capabilities. Conclusions RT is indeed beneficial for the whole cohort in this study. However, it may be omitted in the low-risk subgroup without significantly sacrificing survival. For patients in the high-risk group, RT following BCS remained beneficial. This study highlights the need for prospective randomized trials to study RT de-escalation strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02279-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35953665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Cardiology ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Hormones ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nomograms ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Prospective Studies ; Rheumatology ; SEER Program ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2022-10, Vol.39 (10), p.4707-4722</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-e3d30a8cb8c782fb206496bafc33b0948741be3115c8ef4aeec6c4a950012b743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7412-0270</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953665$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Juanjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhenggui</creatorcontrib><title>Can Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery be Omitted in Elderly Patients with Early-Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer? A Population-Based Study and Proposed Nomogram</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction We aimed to evaluate whether radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be omitted in elderly patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Methods Patients aged 65 years and older with T1–2N0–1, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer in 2010–2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline of different groups. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier plot and log-rank test. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariate Cox analysis. A nomogram predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and a risk stratification model were constructed and validated. Results A total of 4465 patients were included and 27.7% (1237/4465) patients did not receive postoperative RT. RT was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.552 P  &lt; 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.559, P  &lt; 0.001) in the matched cohort. The same results were found after adjusting independent risk factors by multivariate analysis. On the basis of the nomogram predicting BCSS of patients without RT by incorporating independent risk factors (age, race, HER2 status, T stage, and N stage), we built a risk stratification model which indicated that RT improved OS (HR = 0.511, P  &lt; 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.517, P  &lt; 0.001) in the high-risk group (total score &gt; 150), but not in the low-risk group (total score ≤ 120). The C-index and all calibration curves demonstrated sufficient accuracies and good predictive capabilities. Conclusions RT is indeed beneficial for the whole cohort in this study. However, it may be omitted in the low-risk subgroup without significantly sacrificing survival. For patients in the high-risk group, RT following BCS remained beneficial. This study highlights the need for prospective randomized trials to study RT de-escalation strategies.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSAwR_5cE5ou1ooUtWuuiBxsxxnkqZK7GA7Rflp_Xd42YUjh9FIM--8Y8-D0BtGPzBKy4-BccFzQjk_RFmR5RlaMVnkJAV_jla0zBjhQv44Q-chPFDKaZnLl-hM5FUuiiJfoaeNtvhON72L9-D1tOB1G8HjSw86RLJxNoB_7G2H97PvwC-4Bnw79jFCg3uLt0MDfljwTscebAz4Vx_v8VanGtlH3cF7fOX86CyQOzAwRefxDXRJ_QinJTg9wYD_hNd456Z5SD1nyaUOacM-zs2CtW3wzrvJHUo3bnSd1-Mr9KLVQ4DXp3yBvn_efttckevbL18362tiOJeRgGgE1dLU0pSStzWnRVYVtW6NEDWtMpluVINgLDcS2kwDmMJkusopZbwuM3GB3h19J-9-zhCiGvtgYBi0BTcHxUvKWcUrJpKUH6XGuxA8tGry_aj9ohhVB2TqiEwlXOoPMrWkobcn_7keofk38pdREoijIKSWTQzUg5u9TX_-n-1vfW6lew</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Xu, Li</creator><creator>Zhou, Chen</creator><creator>Qiu, Juanjuan</creator><creator>Lv, Qing</creator><creator>Du, Zhenggui</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7412-0270</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Can Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery be Omitted in Elderly Patients with Early-Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer? A Population-Based Study and Proposed Nomogram</title><author>Xu, Li ; Zhou, Chen ; Qiu, Juanjuan ; Lv, Qing ; Du, Zhenggui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-e3d30a8cb8c782fb206496bafc33b0948741be3115c8ef4aeec6c4a950012b743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Juanjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhenggui</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Li</au><au>Zhou, Chen</au><au>Qiu, Juanjuan</au><au>Lv, Qing</au><au>Du, Zhenggui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery be Omitted in Elderly Patients with Early-Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer? A Population-Based Study and Proposed Nomogram</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><stitle>Adv Ther</stitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4707</spage><epage>4722</epage><pages>4707-4722</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Introduction We aimed to evaluate whether radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be omitted in elderly patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Methods Patients aged 65 years and older with T1–2N0–1, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer in 2010–2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline of different groups. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier plot and log-rank test. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariate Cox analysis. A nomogram predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and a risk stratification model were constructed and validated. Results A total of 4465 patients were included and 27.7% (1237/4465) patients did not receive postoperative RT. RT was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.552 P  &lt; 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.559, P  &lt; 0.001) in the matched cohort. The same results were found after adjusting independent risk factors by multivariate analysis. On the basis of the nomogram predicting BCSS of patients without RT by incorporating independent risk factors (age, race, HER2 status, T stage, and N stage), we built a risk stratification model which indicated that RT improved OS (HR = 0.511, P  &lt; 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.517, P  &lt; 0.001) in the high-risk group (total score &gt; 150), but not in the low-risk group (total score ≤ 120). The C-index and all calibration curves demonstrated sufficient accuracies and good predictive capabilities. Conclusions RT is indeed beneficial for the whole cohort in this study. However, it may be omitted in the low-risk subgroup without significantly sacrificing survival. For patients in the high-risk group, RT following BCS remained beneficial. This study highlights the need for prospective randomized trials to study RT de-escalation strategies.</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>35953665</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12325-022-02279-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7412-0270</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-238X
ispartof Advances in therapy, 2022-10, Vol.39 (10), p.4707-4722
issn 0741-238X
1865-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2702192913
source Springer Link; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cardiology
Endocrinology
Female
Hormones
Humans
Internal Medicine
Mastectomy, Segmental - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neoplasm Staging
Nomograms
Oncology
Original Research
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Prospective Studies
Rheumatology
SEER Program
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
title Can Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery be Omitted in Elderly Patients with Early-Stage, Hormone-Receptor Negative Breast Cancer? A Population-Based Study and Proposed Nomogram
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T13%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Radiotherapy%20After%20Breast-Conserving%20Surgery%20be%20Omitted%20in%20Elderly%20Patients%20with%20Early-Stage,%20Hormone-Receptor%20Negative%20Breast%20Cancer?%20A%20Population-Based%20Study%20and%20Proposed%20Nomogram&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Xu,%20Li&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4707&rft.epage=4722&rft.pages=4707-4722&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12325-022-02279-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2702192913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-e3d30a8cb8c782fb206496bafc33b0948741be3115c8ef4aeec6c4a950012b743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702192913&rft_id=info:pmid/35953665&rfr_iscdi=true