Loading…

Could video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery be feasible for blunt trauma patients with massive haemothorax?

•VATS could be applied to selected blunt trauma patients with massive haemothorax.•The major differences between the VATS and thoracotomy groups were coagulopathy, acidosis, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 mmHg, or a persistent need for blood transfusion.•The conversion to thoracotomy rate of VATS for blun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Injury 2023-01, Vol.54 (1), p.44-50
Main Authors: Huang, Jen-Fu, Ou Yang, Chun-Hsiang, Cheng, Chi-Tung, Hsu, Chih-Po, Wen, Chih-Tsung, Liao, Chien-Hung, Hsieh, Chi-Hsun, Fu, Chih-Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•VATS could be applied to selected blunt trauma patients with massive haemothorax.•The major differences between the VATS and thoracotomy groups were coagulopathy, acidosis, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 mmHg, or a persistent need for blood transfusion.•The conversion to thoracotomy rate of VATS for blunt trauma patients with massive haemothorax was 26% in the current study.•VATS took more time for anaesthesia and preparation. The study reviewed the experience of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of massive haemothorax (MHT). All adult patients who sustained blunt trauma with a diagnosis of traumatic haemothorax or pneumothorax (ICD9 860; ICD10 S27.0–2), injury to the heart and lungs (ICD9 861; ICD10 S26, S27.3–9), and injury to the blood vessels of the thorax (ICD9 901; ICD10 S25) were queried from the trauma registry between 2014 and 2018. Patients who had chest tube drainage amounts meeting the criteria for MHT and who underwent subsequent operations were eligible for analyses. The patients were divided into VATS or thoracotomy groups based on the surgical modalities. Descriptions and analyses of the two groups were made. Thirty-eight patients were enroled in the study, including 8 females (21%) and 30 males. The median age was 47.0 (first quartile (Q1) 25.5 and third quartile (Q3) 59.3) years. Twenty-three patients were in the VATS group, six (26%) of whom were converted to thoracotomy. There were no obvious differences in age, sex, pulse rate, or systolic pressure on arrival to the ED or after resuscitation between the two groups. The laboratory data were worse amongst the thoracotomy group, especially the arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) results: pH 7.2 (7.1, 7.3) vs. 7.4 (7.2, 7.4); HCO3 14.6 (12.4, 18.7) vs. 19.7 (16.1, 23.9) mEq/L; base excess (BE) -12.6 (-15.8, -7.8) vs. -5.2 (-11.1, -0.9) mEq/L. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was lower in the thoracotomy group (91.4 (68.5, 193.3) vs. 245.3 (95.7, 398.0) mmHg). The thoracotomy group had coagulopathy (INR 1.6 (1.2, 1.9) vs. 1.3 (1.1, 1.4)) and required more blood transfusions (WB and PRBC 36.0 (16.0, 48.0) vs. 12.0 (4.0, 24.0) units; FFP 20.0 (6.0, 50.0) vs. 6.0 (2.0, 20.0) unit). No factors associated with VATS conversion to thoracotomy could be identified. VATS could be applied to selected blunt trauma patients with MHT. The major differences between the VATS and thoracotomy groups were coagulopathy, acidosis, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 mmHg, or a persistent need for blood transfusion.
ISSN:0020-1383
1879-0267
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.029