A comparative assessment of neutropenia events, healthcare resource use, and costs among cancer patients treated with lipegfilgrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in Germany

Purpose We assessed the occurrence of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) and the associated healthcare resource in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in combination with pegfilgrastim versus lipegfilgrastim. Methods This is a retrospective analysis using a German health in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2022-11, Vol.30 (11), p.9317-9327
Main Authors: Link, Hartmut, Thompson, Stephen F., Tian, Marc, Haas, Jennifer S., Meise, Dominic, Maas, Christopher, Dimitrov, Stamen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Breast cancer
Cancer
Cancer patients
Chemotherapy
Comparative analysis
Health aspects
Health insurance industry
Health services utilization
Lymphoma
Lymphomas
Medical care, Cost of
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neutropenia
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine
Risk factors
Side effects
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose We assessed the occurrence of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) and the associated healthcare resource in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in combination with pegfilgrastim versus lipegfilgrastim. Methods This is a retrospective analysis using a German health insurance claims database. Adults receiving chemotherapy with a prescription code for pegfilgrastim ( n  = 734) or lipegfilgrastim ( n  = 346) were observed over a 1-year follow-up period. Patient subgroups were analyzed according to cancer type and FN risk. FN risk was based on the chemotherapy regimen and any additional neutropenia risk factors. Outcomes were adjusted via regression analysis. Results Most patients were classified as high FN risk (70.0% pegfilgrastim; 65.6% lipegfilgrastim cohort). The mean age was 58.2 years in the pegfilgrastim cohort and 58.0 years in the lipegfilgrastim cohort, with more female patients than male patients (77.3% vs 79.8%, respectively), and the majority had breast cancer (64.9% and 68.8%, respectively). Overall, 10.0% and 10.4% of patients receiving pegfilgrastim or lipegfilgrastim experienced a neutropenia event ( p  = 0.82), with 4.4% and 3.5% of patients experiencing a FN event ( p  = 0.49). The mean neutropenia event-related healthcare costs were €604 and €441 for the pegfilgrastim and lipegfilgrastim cohorts; among patients with lymphoma, these costs were significantly greater ( p  = 0.03) with pegfilgrastim (€1,612) versus lipegfilgrastim (€382). The mean all-cause hospitalizations were significantly ( p  
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-022-07353-3