Loading…
Combined application of neural stem/progenitor cells and scaffolds on locomotion recovery following spinal cord injury in rodents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background This present study evaluates the pre-clinical evidence on the efficacy of NS/PC and scaffold (NS/PC + scaffold) transplantation on locomotor recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Method Two independent reviewers screened the records gathered through a systematic search in MED...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurosurgical review 2022-12, Vol.45 (6), p.3469-3488 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
This present study evaluates the pre-clinical evidence on the efficacy of NS/PC and scaffold (NS/PC + scaffold) transplantation on locomotor recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
Method
Two independent reviewers screened the records gathered through a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases. Studies on rats/mice evaluating the efficacy of simultaneous transplantation of NS/PCs and scaffold in the treatment of SCI were included. The results were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
Results
Forty-seven articles were retrieved. Analyses showed that NS/PC + scaffold transplantation significantly improved locomotion in animals with SCI compared to that of the non-treatment group (SMD = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.89 to 3.54;
I
2
= 95.15%,
p
< 0.0001), scaffold alone (SMD = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.56 to 3.00;
I
2
= 94.38%;
p
< 0.0001), and NS/PCs alone (SMD = 1.74, 95% CI: 0.64 to 2.83;
I
2
= 92.02%,
p
< 0.0001). Moreover, the effectiveness of the treatment significantly increases when PLGA-based scaffolds and antibiotics are used. In addition, the NS/PC + scaffold transplantation during the first week after injury led to a significant improvement in locomotion, while concomitant transplantation of NS/PC + scaffold did not improve locomotion in cervical lesions.
Conclusion
The findings showed that using NS/PCs with scaffold not only improves locomotion recovery, but also is superior to NS/PCs alone and scaffold alone. Future experiments and translational clinical studies are recommended to focus on the assessment of the safety and efficacy of the application of NS/PC + scaffold on SCI recovery. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1437-2320 1437-2320 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10143-022-01859-4 |