Loading…
Understanding of synergy in non-isothermal microwave-assisted in-situ catalytic co-pyrolysis of rice husk and polystyrene waste mixtures
[Display omitted] •In-situ catalytic co-pyrolysis of Rice husk (RH) and Polystyrene (PS) was conducted.•Pyrolysis index increased (17–445) with the increase of feedstock quantity.•Catalytic co-pyrolysis is rich in aromatic hydrocarbons (92%)•PS promoted the oil yield (70 wt%) and RH enhanced the cha...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioresource technology 2022-09, Vol.360, p.127589-127589, Article 127589 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•In-situ catalytic co-pyrolysis of Rice husk (RH) and Polystyrene (PS) was conducted.•Pyrolysis index increased (17–445) with the increase of feedstock quantity.•Catalytic co-pyrolysis is rich in aromatic hydrocarbons (92%)•PS promoted the oil yield (70 wt%) and RH enhanced the char yield (34 wt%)•PS and RH interactions caused the positive and negative synergy effect.
Rice husk (RH) and polystyrene (PS) wastes were converted into value-added products using microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis. The graphite susceptor (10 g) along with KOH catalyst (5 g) was mixed with the feedstock to understand the products and energy consumption. RH promoted the char yield (20–34 wt%) and gaseous yields (16–25 wt%) whereas PS enhanced the oil yield (23–70 wt%). Co-pyrolysis synergy induced an increase in gaseous yields (14–53 wt%) due to excessive cracking. The specific microwave energy consumption dramatically decreased in co-pyrolysis (5–22 kJ/g) compared to pyrolysis (56–102 kJ/g). The pyrolysis index increased (17–445) with the increase in feedstock quantity (5–50 g). The obtained oil was composed of monoaromatics (74%) and polyaromatics (18%). The char was rich in carbon content (79.5 wt%) and the gases were composed of CO (24%), H2 (12%), and CH4 (22%). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127589 |